4.6 Article

Unveiling the Charge Storage Mechanism of Layered and Tunnel Structures of Manganese Oxides as Electrodes for Supercapacitors

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 163, 期 7, 页码 A1460-A1468

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.0091608jes

关键词

-

资金

  1. UGC
  2. DST, India [SR/FT/CS-74/2011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of high performance active materials for supercapacitors that can outperform the state of art RuO2 is highly desirable to meet the next generation high power storage devices. In this regard, manganese oxide (MnO2) based materials have been intensively investigated in pseudocapacitors due to their high theoretical specific capacitance, natural abundance, good chemical and thermal stability, environmental benignity and low cost. Unfortunately, mechanism of electrochemical charge storage of MnO2 is not well understood. Here, we present a detailed charge storage mechanism of layered (delta-MnO2) and tunnel (alpha-MnO2) structures and the capacitance difference between layered and tunnel structures by preparing MnO2 nanostructures using permanganate and amino acids such as glycine, arginine and glutamic acid. Physico-chemical characterizations were carried out using powder X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetric analysis and infrared spectroscopy. Field emission scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy and high resolution transmission electron microscopy were conducted to analyze the morphology and structural characteristics of the materials synthesized. The electrochemical performance of MnO2 nanostructures is assessed using cyclic voltammogram (CV) and galvanostatic charge-discharge analysis. Complete physico-chemical and electrochemical investigations strongly support that surface adsorption-desorption of cations is predominant in layered delta-MnO2, while tunnel alpha-MnO2 is more favorable for cation intercalation-deintercalation process. (C) 2016 The Electrochemical Society. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据