4.5 Article

Perceived benefits and barriers to implementing precision preventive care: Results of a national physician survey

期刊

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41431-023-01318-8

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A survey was conducted among primary care physicians (PCPs) in a national physician database to investigate the clinical utility and barriers to the use of polygenic risk scores (PRS) in preventive care. The results showed that PCPs generally endorse the use of PRS in guiding preventive care decisions, but also identified some barriers that need to be addressed. The findings provide suggestions for interventions to address their needs and concerns.
Polygenic risk scores (PRS) may improve risk-stratification in preventive care. Their clinical implementation will depend on primary care physicians' (PCPs) uptake. We surveyed PCPs in a national physician database about the perceived clinical utility, benefits, and barriers to the use of PRS in preventive care. Among 367 respondents (participation rate 96.3%), mean (SD) age was 54.9 (12.9) years, 137 (37.3%) were female, and mean (SD) time since medical school graduation was 27.2 (13.3) years. Respondents reported greater perceived utility for more clinical action (e.g., earlier or more intensive screening, preventive medications, or lifestyle modification) for patients with high-risk PRS than for delayed or discontinued prevention actions for low-risk patients (p < 0.001). Respondents most often chose out-of-pocket costs (48%), lack of clinical guidelines (24%), and insurance discrimination concerns (22%) as extreme barriers. Latent class analysis identified 3 subclasses of respondents. Skeptics (n = 83, 22.6%) endorsed less agreement with individual clinical utilities, saw patient anxiety and insurance discrimination as significant barriers, and agreed less often that PRS could help patients make better health decisions. Learners (n = 134, 36.5%) and enthusiasts (n = 150, 40.9%) expressed similar levels of agreement that PRS had utility for preventive actions and that PRS could be useful for patient decision-making. Compared with enthusiasts, however, learners perceived greater barriers to the clinical use of PRS. Overall results suggest that PCPs generally endorse using PRS to guide medical decision-making about preventive care, and barriers identified suggest interventions to address their needs and concerns.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

Article Pharmacology & Pharmacy

A coordinated strategy to develop and distribute infographics addressing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and misinformation

Shannon M. Rotolo, Shikha Jain, Serena Dhaon, Jack K. Dokhanchi, Elzbieta Kalata, Tejal Shah, Lisa J. Mordell, Marla L. Clayman, Alexandra Kenefake, Laura J. Zimmermann, Eve Bloomgarden, Vineet M. Arora

Summary: This study describes the approach of a coalition of health professionals in developing infographics about COVID-19 vaccines and the reach and engagement of those infographics when shared through social media. The study found that the infographics had greater outreach, impressions, and engagement on Twitter compared to other platforms.

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION (2022)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

It All Depends: Patient and Decision Partner Experiences in Cancer Clinical Trial Decision-Making

Tamryn F. Gray, Sarah J. Allgood, Marie T. Nolan, Joseph J. Gallo, Hae-Ra Han, Marla L. Clayman, Chakra Budhathoki, Dina G. Lansey, Jennifer Wenzel

Summary: This study aims to examine the clinical trial decision-making process from the perspective of cancer patients and their decision partners. Through interviews with patients and decision partners, important themes emerged, including the ability and confidence to make decisions, gaining insight about clinical trials, trusting someone in the process, and realizing readiness and context. These findings enhance understanding of how patients make clinical trial decisions based on decisional preferences and highlight the importance of including decision partners in clinical trial conversations for healthcare professionals.

QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH (2022)

Article Pediatrics

Parental Views of Social Worker and Chaplain Involvement in Care and Decision Making for Critically Ill Children with Cancer

Kelly N. Michelson, Melanie Arenson, Elizabeth Charleston, Marla L. Clayman, Tracy Brazg, Karen Rychlik, Abby R. Rosenberg, Joel Frader

Summary: The study investigated parent perceptions of SW and chaplain involvement in caring for critically ill children with cancer in the pediatric intensive care unit. Most parents found the interactions helpful, but few reported receiving help with decision making. SWs and chaplains were described as providing emotional, spiritual, instrumental, and holistic support, although few parents were aware of their interactions with other healthcare team members. Further research is needed to determine their contributions to parental decision making and improve parent awareness of their roles.

CHILDREN-BASEL (2022)

Article Genetics & Heredity

Primary care physician use of patient race and polygenic risk scores in medical decision-making

Benjamin J. Kerman, Charles A. Brunette, Elizabeth J. Harris, Ashley A. Antwi, Amy A. Lemke, Jason L. Vassy

Summary: This study examines the influence of polygenic risk scores (PRSs) on primary care physician's medical decision-making and investigates whether patient race affects this influence. The results show that, despite identical clinical and genetic profiles, physicians are more likely to recommend treatment and screening for Black patients compared to White patients.

GENETICS IN MEDICINE (2023)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Comprehensive Implementation of Shared Decision Making in a Neuromedical Center Using the SHARE TO CARE Program

Constanze Stolz-Klingenberg, Claudia Buenzen, Marie Coors, Charlotte Flueh, Klarissa Hanja Stuerner, Kai Wehkamp, Marla L. Clayman, Fueloep Scheibler, Jens Ulrich Rueffer, Wiebke Schuettig, Leonie Sundmacher, Daniela Berg, Friedemann Geiger

Summary: SHARE TO CARE (S2C) is a comprehensive program aimed at promoting shared decision making (SDM). It has been successfully implemented at the University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein in Kiel, Germany, and among general practitioners in the Federal State of Bremen. The results of the implementation showed an increase in patients' perceived involvement in medical decision making.

PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE (2023)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Antecedents to COVID-19 vaccine uptake among patients and employees in the Veterans Health Administration

Lara R. LoBrutto, A. Rani Elwy, Danielle Miano, Beth Ann Petrakis, Angela Kyrish, Sarah Javier, Taryn Erhardt, Amanda M. Midboe, Richard Carbonaro, Guneet K. Jasuja, D. Keith McInnes, Elizabeth M. Maguire, Steven M. Asch, Allen L. Gifford, Marla L. Clayman

Summary: This study aims to understand the factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine intention and improve vaccine uptake in the United States. Semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions were conducted with Veterans Health Administration employees and Veterans. Thematic analysis identified themes related to confidence, collective responsibility, complacency, calculation, and constraints, which were associated with changes in vaccine intention. Key factors in promoting vaccine uptake included protecting family and engaging in conversations with trusted healthcare providers.

TRANSLATIONAL BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE (2023)

Editorial Material Health Care Sciences & Services

Flattening Hierarchical Structures to Empower Women Trainee Leaders on Social Media Teams

Marah N. Kays, Deborah Rupert, Olivia Negris, Beatrix Thompson, Marla L. Clayman, Lisa Mordell, Tricia Pendergrast, Eve Bloomgarden, Rakhee K. Bhayani, Shikha Jain

Summary: We share our experience of empowering women trainees and leadership through a flattened hierarchical social media team structure, supported by measurable outcomes.

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH (2023)

Article Oncology

Fertility Preservation Decisional Turning Points for Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer: Exploring Alignment and Divergence by Race and Ethnicity

Mollie R. Canzona, Karly Murphy, David Victorson, Onengiya Harry, Marla L. Clayman, Thomas W. McLean, Shannon L. Golden, Bonnie Patel, Carla Strom, Denisha Little-Greene, Siba Saker, John M. Salsman

Summary: This study aims to examine the differences in fertility preservation decision making among non-Hispanic White AYAs and racial/ethnic minority AYAs. Interviews with 36 AYAs revealed seven key decisional turning points. The findings will contribute to reducing health disparities and improving patient-centered care.

JCO ONCOLOGY PRACTICE (2023)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

The Six Steps of SDM: linking theory to practice, measurement and implementation

Marla L. Clayman, Fueloep Scheibler, Jens Ulrich Rueffer, Kai Wehkamp, Friedemann Geiger

BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE (2023)

Meeting Abstract Health Care Sciences & Services

THE ILLINOIS MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS ACTION COLLABORATIVE TEAM (IMPACT): REDEFINING CONNECTIVITY BY LEVERAGING SOCIAL MEDIA TO RAPIDLY IDENTIFY AND ADDRESS VACCINE ACCESS AND HESITANCY

Sandra Folarin, Laura J. Zimmermann, Halleh Akbarnia, Ameera Haamid, Susan Lopez, Marla Clayman, Jack Dokhanchi, Elzbieta Kalata, Tejal Shah, Eve Bloomgarden, Shikha Jain, Serena Dhaon, Lisa J. Mordell, Alim. Khan, Amisha Wallia, Vineet M. Arora

JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE (2022)

Meeting Abstract Psychology, Multidisciplinary

MOVING FROM COVID-19 VACCINE HESITANCY TO ACCEPTANCE AMONG PATIENTS AND EMPLOYEES AT THE VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION

Lara LoBrutto, Marla L. Clayman, A. Rani Elwy, Richard Carbonaro, Danielle Miano, Angela Kyrish, Sarah Javier, Taryn Erhardt, Amanda Midboe, Guneet Jasuja, D. Keith McInnes, Steven M. Asch, Allen L. Gifford, Beth Ann Petrakis, Elizabeth M. Maguire

ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE (2022)

Meeting Abstract Psychology, Multidisciplinary

RECORDED RESEARCH SPOTLIGHT: COMMUNICATION ABOUT COVID-19 MITIGATION STRATEGIES AMONG ILLINOIS HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS: A PILOT STUDY

Allison Mobley, Hannah J. Getachew-Smith, Marla L. Clayman, Lisa J. Mordell, Serena Dhaon, Shikha Jain, Vineet Arora

ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE (2022)

Meeting Abstract Oncology

Turning Points in Fertility Preservation Decision-Making Among AYAs With Cancer From Diverse Racial and Ethnic Backgrounds

Mollie Canzona, Karly Murphy, David Victorson, Marla Clayman, Onengiya Onengiya Harry, Bonnie Patel, Thomas McLean, Shannon Golden, Denisha Little-Greene, Siba Saker, John Salsman

PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY (2022)

暂无数据