4.6 Review

Rational design of high-entropy ceramics based on machine learning-A critical review

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cossms.2023.101057

关键词

Machine learning; High -entropy ceramics; Phase stability; Mechanical properties; Deep learning; Single-phase synthesizability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-entropy ceramics (HECs) have shown great potential due to their superior structural and functional properties, but the vast phase space behind HECs makes it difficult to design high-performance HECs through traditional methods. Machine learning (ML) has become a popular approach to accelerate the discovery and design of HECs with exceptional properties. This article reviews the recent progress of ML applications in discovering and designing novel HECs and discusses the challenges and future development of ML models for HEC predictions.
High-entropy materials provide a versatile platform for the rational design of novel candidates with exotic performances. Recently, it has been demonstrated that high-entropy ceramics (HECs), depending on their compositions, show great application potential because of their superior structural and functional properties. However, the immense phase space behind HECs significantly hinders the efficient design and exploitation of high-performance HECs through traditional trial-and-error experiments and expensive ab-initio calculations. Machine learning (ML), on the other hand, has become a popular approach to accelerate the discovery of HECs and screen HECs with exceptional properties. In this article, we review the recent progress of ML applications in discovering and designing novel HECs, including carbides, nitrides, borides, and oxides. We thoroughly discuss different ingredients that are involved in ML applications in HECs, including data collection, feature engineering, model refinement, and prediction performance improvement. We finally provide an outlook on the challenges and development directions of future ML models for HEC predictions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据