4.7 Article

Halide/sulfide composite solid-state electrolyte for Li-anode based all-solid-state batteries

期刊

CHINESE CHEMICAL LETTERS
卷 34, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108228

关键词

Li2ZrCl6; Li6PS5Cl; Composite solid-state electrolyte; Interface stability; Li anode

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Li2ZrCl6(LZC) solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) have potential as a halide SSE for all-solid-state Li batteries (ASSLBs) due to their compatibility with cathodes and low cost. However, the instability of LZC against Li metal affects Li+ transport in ASSLBs.
Li2ZrCl6 (LZC) solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) have been recognized as a candidate halide SSEs for allsolid-state Li batteries (ASSLBs) with high energy density and safety due to its great compatibility with 4 V-class cathodes and low bill-of-material (BOM) cost. However, despite the benefits, the poor chemical/electrochemical stability of LZC against Li metal causes the deterioration of Li/LZC interface, which has a detrimental inhibition on Li+ transport in ASSLBs. Herein, we report a composite SSE combining by LZC and argyrodite buffer layer (Li6PS5Cl, LPSC) that prevent the unfavorable interaction between LZC and Li metal. The Li/LPSC-LZC-LPSC/Li symmetric cell stably cycles for over 1000 h at 0.3 mA/cm(2) (0.15 mAh/cm(2)) and has a high critical current density (CCD) value of 2.1 mA/cm(2) at 25 degrees C. Under high temperature (60 degrees C) which promotes the reaction between Li and LZC, symmetric cell fabricated with composite SSE also display stable cycling performance over 1200 h at 0.3 mAh/cm(2). Especially, the Li/NCM ASSLBs fabricated with composite SSE exhibit a high initial coulombic efficiency, as well as superior cycling and rate performance. This simple and efficient strategy will be instrumental in the development of halidebased high-performance ASSLBs. (c) 2023 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Chinese Chemical Society and Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据