4.4 Article

Using LASSO regularization to project recruitment under CMIP6 climate scenarios in a coastal fishery with spatial oceanographic gradients

出版社

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/cjfas-2022-0091

关键词

recruitment; LASSO; CMIP6; climate change; surfclam; oceanography

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study uses regularization technique and improved climate change projections to investigate the relationship between Atlantic surfclam and climate variables. The results show a negative correlation between western surfclam recruitment and sea surface temperature, and a negative correlation between eastern recruitment and eastward spring wind intensity in New York State waters. It is projected that recruitment will decrease 100% in western waters and remain sporadic, but high, in eastern waters by 2050.
As climate change disrupts fisheries, scientists are interested in fisheries projections under climate change scenarios. How-ever, projections that account for spatial oceanographic gradients use increased variable selection power and output high spa-tial resolution climate data are needed to improve strategic fisheries management. This study uses the least absolute squares and selection operator, a regularization technique, and improved, climate change projections from phase 6 of the Couple Model Intercomparison Project to relate Atlantic surfclam, Spisula solidissima solidissima, recruitment to climate variables. Re-sults show a longitudinal gradient in New York State waters where western recruitment displays a negative relationship with sea surface temperature and eastern recruitment displays a negative relationship with eastward spring wind intensity. Models project that recruitment in 2050 will decrease 100% in western waters and remain sporadic, but high, in eastern waters. This study provides insight regarding surfclam responses to climate change and considerations (methodological and statistical) for improved climate-based fisheries projections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据