4.8 Article

Low-Dimensional 2-thiopheneethylammonium Lead Halide Capping Layer Enables Efficient Single-Junction Methylamine- Free Wide-Bandgap and Tandem Perovskite Solar Cells

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 33, 期 30, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202300860

关键词

open-circuit voltage deficit; perovskite tandem solar cells; phase segregation; wide-bandgap perovskites

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A post-treatment strategy is proposed to form a 2D top layer on wide-bandgap perovskite solar cells, which effectively passivates defects and suppresses phase segregation. The resulting perovskite solar cells with a 1.66 eV-bandgap achieve high power conversion efficiencies and show promise for multi-junction tandem solar cell applications.
Wide-bandgap (WBG) perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have garnered significant attention for their potential applications in tandem solar cells. However, their large open-circuit voltage (V-OC) deficit and serious photo-induced halide segregation remain the main challenges that impede their applications. Herein, a post-treatment strategy without thermal annealing is presented to form a 2D top layer of 2-thiopheneethylammonium lead halide (n = 1) on WBG perovskites. This thermal annealing-free post-treatment method can more effectively passivate the defects of WBG methylamine (MA)-free formamidinium/cesium lead iodide/bromide perovskite films and suppress photo-induced perovskite phase segregation, as compared with the thermal annealing method that yields multi-2D phases. The resulting opaque and semi-transparent 1.66 eV-bandgap perovskite solar cells deliver maximum power conversion efficiencies of 21.47% (a small V-OC deficit of 0.43 V) and 19.11%, respectively, both of which are among the highest reports for inverted MA-free WBG PSCs. Consequently, four-terminal all-perovskite tandem cells realize a remarkable efficiency of 26.64%, showing great promise for their applications in efficient multi-junction tandem solar cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据