4.6 Article

A comparative characterization of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells induced by mRNA or inactive virus COVID-19 vaccines

期刊

CELL REPORTS MEDICINE
卷 3, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100793

关键词

-

资金

  1. Singapore Ministry of Healths National Medical Research Council [COVID19RF3-0060, COVID19RF-001, COV-ID19RF-008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compares the T cell responses in individuals vaccinated with inactivated SARS-CoV-2 or mRNA vaccines. Compared to mRNA vaccines, inactivated vaccines induce a lower magnitude of spike-specific T cell response, but the combination of other protein-specific T cell responses is quantitatively comparable to the spike-specific T cell response induced by mRNA vaccines and can efficiently tolerate the mutations of the Omicron lineage. However, this multi-protein-specific T cell response is primarily mediated by selective priming of CD4 T cells rather than coordinated expansion of CD4 and CD8 T cells.
Unlike mRNA vaccines based only on the spike protein, inactivated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines should induce a diversified T cell response recognizing distinct struc-tural proteins. Here, we perform a comparative analysis of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells in healthy individuals following vaccination with inactivated SARS-CoV-2 or mRNA vaccines. Relative to spike mRNA vaccination, inactivated vaccines elicit a lower magnitude of spike-specific T cells, but the combination of membrane, nucleoprotein, and spike-specific T cell response is quantitatively comparable with the sole spike T cell response induced by mRNA vaccine, and they efficiently tolerate the mutations characterizing the Omicron lineage. However, this multi-protein-specific T cell response is not mediated by a coordinated CD4 and CD8 T cell expansion but by selective priming of CD4 T cells. These findings can help in understanding the role of CD4 and CD8 T cells in the efficacy of the different vaccines to control severe COVID-19 after Omicron infec-tion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据