4.2 Article

MiR-301a Mediates the Effect of IL-6 on the AKT/GSK Pathway and Hepatic Glycogenesis by Regulating PTEN Expression

期刊

CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 35, 期 4, 页码 1413-1424

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000373962

关键词

MiR-301a; IL-6 PTEN; AKT; GSK glycogensis

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2012CB517502, 2014CB910503]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81070634, 81270887]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: IL-6 has been implicated in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance. MiR-301a plays an important role in various biological and pathological processes, including cellular development and differentiation, inflammation, apoptosis and cancer. However, whether miR-301a mediates IL-6-induced insulin resistance in hepatocytes remains unknown. Methods: The activation of AKT/GSK pathway and the level of glycogenesis were examed in NCTC 1469 cells transfected miR-301a mimics and inhibitor. Using computational miRNA target prediction database, PTEN was a target of miR-301a. The effect of miR-301a on PTEN expression was evaluated using Luciferase assay and western blot. A PTEN-specific siRNA was used to further determine the effect of PTEN on IL-6-induced insulin resistance. Results: In vivo and in vitro treatment with IL-6 was led to down-regulation of miR-301a, accompanied by impairment of theAKT/GSK pathway and glycogenesis. Importantly, over-expression of miR-301a rescued IL-6-induced decreased activation of the AKT/GSK pathway and hepatic glycogenesis. In contrast, down-regulation of miR-301a induced impaired phosphorylation of AKT and GSK, accompanied by reduced glycogenesis in hepatocytes. Moreover, our results indicate that suppression of PTEN, a target of miR-301a, diminished the effect of IL-6 on the AKT/GSK pathway and hepatic glycogenesis. Conclusion: We present novel evidence of the contribution of miR-301a to IL-6-induced insulin resistance by direct regulation of PTEN expression. Copyright (C) 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据