4.6 Article

Generalized isotropic Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick models: ground state entanglement and quantum entropies

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1742-5468/2016/03/033114

关键词

solvable lattice models; conformal field theory (theory); entanglement in extended quantum systems (theory)

资金

  1. Spain's MINECO [FIS2011-22566]
  2. Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Banco Santander [GR3/14-910556]
  3. Madrid township
  4. Residencia de Estudiantes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We introduce a new class of generalized isotropic Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick models with su(m + 1) spin and long- range non- constant interactions, whose non- degenerate ground state is a Dicke state of su(m + 1) type. We evaluate in closed form the reduced density matrix of a block of L spins when the whole system is in its ground state, and study the corresponding von Neumann and REnyi entanglement entropies in the thermodynamic limit. We show that both of these entropies scale as a log L when L tends to infinity, where the coe. cient a is equal to (m - k)/2 in the ground state phase with k vanishing su(m + 1) magnon densities. In particular, our results show that none of these generalized Lipkin- Meshkov- Glick models are critical, since when L -> infinity their REnyi entropy Rq becomes independent of the parameter q. We have also computed the Tsallis entanglement entropy of the ground state of these generalized su(m + 1) Lipkin- Meshkov- Glick models, finding that it can be made extensive by an appropriate choice of its parameter only when m - k >= 3. Finally, in the su(3) case we construct in detail the phase diagram of the ground state in parameter space, showing that it is determined in a simple way by the weights of the fundamental representation of su(3). This is also true in the su(m + 1) case; for instance, we prove that the region for which all the magnon densities are non-vanishing is an (m + 1)-simplex in Rm whose vertices are the weights of the fundamental representation of su(m + 1).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据