4.0 Article

Color doppler ultrasound for diagnosis of testicular carcinoma: A comparison with gold standard histopathology

期刊

ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY
卷 84, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104938

关键词

Testicular carcinoma; Color Doppler ultrasound; Quality improvement; Malignant tumors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of color doppler ultrasound in testicular carcinoma, finding a sensitivity of 88.8% and specificity of 78.1% in diagnosing scrotal diseases. The conclusion suggests that color doppler ultrasound is an excellent, safe, and reliable method for evaluating patients with testicular carcinoma, although it has its limitations and requires expertise and experience.
Introduction: Testicular carcinoma is the most common cancer among males aged 15-34 years. The known risk factors for testicular cancer include undescended testis (cryptorchidism), testicular dysfunction, perinatal factors and prior history of cancer in one testis. We aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of color doppler ultrasound in diagnosis of testicular carcinoma using histopathology as GOLD STANDARD. Method: ology: A cross sectional study was conducted from July 2015 to Feb 2016 at the Department of Radiology, Jinnah Post Graduate Medical Center, Karachi. 311 subjects were selected through inpatient/outpatient or emergency department. Patients were evaluated for testicular carcinoma by color doppler ultrasound on Toshiba nemio. Finding of color doppler ultrasound was compared with histopathology. True positive, true negative, false positive, false negative as per operational definition was determined. Results: Mean age of the patients of the study was 41.76 +/- 8.11 (30-50) and mean and SD of Duration of symptoms was 5.5 +/- 3.5 (4-15) months. Of 175(56.27%) subjects diagnosed as testicular carcinoma on CDUS, only 160(48.55%) were subsequently found to have testicular carcinoma. sensitivity of CDUS in diagnosing scrotal diseases was 88.8% while specificity was 78.1%. Conclusion: We conclude that CDUS is an excellent, safe, and reliable method for evaluating patients with testicular carcinoma. It helps to improve patient's management, especially by preventing unnecessary surgical exploration. It is also convenient and easy to perform. But it has its own limitations, and requires adequate expertise and experience. Its results are also equipment dependent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据