4.7 Article

Insights from ozone and particulate matter pollution control in New York City applied to Beijing

期刊

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41612-022-00309-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) [48971]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [42021004]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFC0213802]
  4. China's Ministry of Ecology and Environment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Strict emission control policies in New York City and Beijing during summertime have shown impacts on the nonlinear relationship between ozone and fine particulate matter. These policies have resulted in a weaker control effect on ozone compared to PM2.5, and have also enhanced the suppression effect on PM2.5. Regional emission reductions are necessary to avoid further increase in ozone and PM2.5 levels.
Strict emission control policies implemented in two megacities of New York City (NYC) and Beijing show impacts on the non-linear relationship of their ozone (O-3) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) during summertime. Here we show these non-linear O-3/PM(2.5 )relationships including a positive linear part reflecting th O-3-/PM2.5 co-occurrence and a negative power function part reflecting the O-3 formation suppression by PM2.5 based on the multiyear surface observations. The control policies targeting sulfur dioxide and PM2.5, then volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxides, changed the PM2.5 chemical composition which resulted in an increased linear slope that indicates a weaker O-3 control effect than occurred for PM2.5. These policies also enhanced the relative PM2.5 suppression effect as shown by an increase in the power function coefficient. Model simulations suggest that regional equal percentage emission reductions for Beijing and other Chinese megacities will be necessary to avoid further increase in the O-3/PM2.5 linear slope and continuing occurrences of high levels of ozone.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据