4.5 Article

Efficacy and Outcome of Rapid Access Rheumatology Consultation: An Office-based Pilot Cohort Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 43, 期 6, 页码 1130-1135

出版社

J RHEUMATOL PUBL CO
DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.151210

关键词

EARLY ARTHRITIS CLINICS; RAPID ACCESS CONSULTATION; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; QUALITY OF CARE; HEALTHCARE RESEARCH

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. Waiting times for first appointments are a major obstacle to timely rheumatology care. To improve access, a cooperative of office-based rheumatologists established an immediate access network, offering brief initial assessments for patients with musculoskeletal problems. Methods. Patients were assessed at presentation and followed up after 6 months. Data were analyzed regarding demographics, diagnostic accuracy, clinical variables such as pain levels, and care. Results. There were 335 patients assessed in the 6 cooperating practices during dedicated office hours. There were 124 patients (38%) who had a symptom duration of < 3 months. For patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), this proportion was 43% (70% for self-referred patients with RA). In the 325 patients available for reassessment after 6 months, initially suspected diagnoses were confirmed in 88%. Confirmation rates were 93% for RA (59 patients) and 84% for spondyloarthritis (SpA; 46 patients). At the followup examination, the visual analog scale for pain in patients with RA had significantly decreased from a median (interquartile range) of 70 (57.75-80) to 27.5 (20-42). For patients with SpA, the decrease was from 65 (50-79) to 30 (20-40). Conclusion. The Rapid Access Clinic resulted in a substantial improvement of access to rheumatology assessment. More than one-third of the patients presented < 3 months after symptom onset. Suspected diagnoses of inflammatory rheumatic diseases were confirmed in almost 90%. This initiative demonstrates the feasibility of a rapid access service and indicates high diagnostic accuracy in such a setting. In particular, with respect to early access, it compares favorably with similar hospital-based approaches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据