4.8 Article

Supramolecular Loading of DNA Hydrogels with Dye-Drug Conjugates for Real-Time Photoacoustic Monitoring of Chemotherapy

期刊

ADVANCED SCIENCE
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/advs.202204330

关键词

bioimaging; drug delivery; drug monitoring; hydrogel; image-guided therapy; in vivo molecular imaging; photoacoustic imaging

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work describes an injectable supramolecular hydrogel that allows slow and trackable release of doxorubicin via photoacoustic tomography. The hydrogel exhibits good biodegradability, maintains long-term contrast in live tissue, and demonstrates activatable photoacoustic spectral shifts during degradation.
A longstanding problem with conventional cancer therapy is the nonspecific distribution of chemotherapeutics. Monitoring drug release in vivo via noninvasive bioimaging can thus have value, but it is difficult to distinguish loaded from released drug in live tissue. Here, this work describes an injectable supramolecular hydrogel that allows slow and trackable release of doxorubicin (Dox) via photoacoustic (PA) tomography. Dox is covalently linked with photoacoustic methylene blue (MB) to monitor Dox before, during, and after release from the hydrogel carrier. The conjugate (MB-Dox) possesses an IC50 of 161.4 x 10(-9) m against human ovarian carcinoma (SKOV3) cells and loads into a DNA-clad hydrogel with 91.3% loading efficiency due to MB-Dox's inherent intramolecular affinity to DNA. The hydrogel is biodegradable by nuclease digestion, which causes gradual release of MB-Dox. This release rate is tunable based on the wt% of the hydrogel. This hydrogel maintains distinct PA contrast on the order of days when injected in vivo and demonstrates activatable PA spectral shifts during hydrogel degradation. The released and loaded payload can be imaged relative to live tissue via PA and ultrasound signal being overlaid in real-time. The hydrogel slowed the rate of the murine intraperitoneal tumor growth 72.2% more than free Dox.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据