4.8 Article

The effect of charging rate on the graphite electrode of commercial lithium-ion cells: A post-mortem study

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 335, 期 -, 页码 189-196

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.10.002

关键词

Lithium-ion; Increased charge rate; Aging; Materials characterization

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/101585X/1]
  2. WMG centre HVM Catapult
  3. Jaguar Land Rover Automotive PLC
  4. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Vehicle Technologies (VTO) [DE-ACO206CH11357]
  5. University of Chicago as Operator of Argonne National Laboratory (Argonne) [W-31-109-Eng-38]
  6. U.S. Department of Energy
  7. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [1237346] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increased charging rates negatively affect the lifetime of lithium-ion cells by increasing cell resistance and reducing capacity. This work is a post-mortem study of 18650-type cells subjected to charge rates of 0.7-, 2-, 4-, and 6-C. For cells charged at 0.7-C to 4-C, this performance degradation is primarily related to surface film thickness with no observable change in surface film chemical composition. However, at charge rates of 6-C, the chemical composition of the surface film changes significantly, suggesting that this change is the reason for the sharper increase in cell resistance compared to the lower charge rates. In addition, we found that surface film formation was not uniform across the electrode. Surface film was thicker and chemically different along the central band of the electrode jelly roll. This result is most likely attributable to an increase in temperature that results from non-uniform electrode wetting during manufacture. This non-uniform change further resulted in active material delamination from the current collector owing to chemical changes to the binder for the cell charged at 6-C. (C) 2016 The Authors and UChicago Argonne, LLC, Operator of Argonne National Laboratory. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据