4.8 Article

Carboxymethyl chitosan/conducting polymer as water-soluble composite binder for LiFePO4 cathode in lithium ion batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 336, 期 -, 页码 107-114

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.10.041

关键词

Conductive water soluble binder; Carboxymethyl chitosan; Cathode; Pilot application; Lithium-ion battery

资金

  1. K.C.Wong Education Foundation
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21573239]
  3. Science & Technology Project of Guangdong Province [2014TX01N014/2015B010135008]
  4. Guangzhou Municipal Project for Science Technology [201509010018]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2015A030313721]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A water-soluble conductive composite binder consisting of carboxymethyl chitosan (CCTS) as a binder and poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) as a conduction-promoting agent is reported for the LiFePO4 (LFP) cathode in Li-ion batteries. The introduction of conductive PEDOT:PSS as a conductive composite binder facilitates the formation of homogeneous and continuous conducting bridges throughout the electrode and raises the compaction density of the electrode sheet by decreasing the amounts of the commonly used conducting agent of acetylene black. The optimized replacement ratios of acetylene black with PEDOT:PSS (acetylene black/PEDOT:PSS = 1:1, by weight) are obtained by measuring electrical conductivity, peel strength and compaction density of the electrode sheets. The LFP half-cell with the optimized conductive binder exhibits better cycling and rate performance and more favorable electrochemical kinetics than that using only acetylene black conducting agent. The pilot application of PEDOT:PSS/CCTS binder in 10 Ah CCTS-LFP prismatic cell exhibits a comparable cycling performance, retaining 89.7% of capacity at 1 C/2 C (charge/discharge) rate as compared with 90% for commercial PVDF-LFP over 1000 cycles, and better rate capability than that of commercial PVDF-LFP, retaining 98% capacity of I C at 7 C rate as compared with 95.4% for PVDF-LFP. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据