4.6 Article

Tailoring stability, catalytic activity and selectivity of covalent metal-organic frameworks via steric modification of metal nodes

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 11, 期 24, 页码 12777-12783

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2ta08797a

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite many efforts in tuning catalytic performance of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) through modification of MOF nodes, steric tuning of MOF nodes via ligand modification remains challenging. In this study, two two-dimensional Cu(I) cyclic trinuclear unit (Cu-CTU)-based MOFs with similar structures, named JNM-1 and JNM-5, were successfully synthesized. JNM-5 exhibited higher crystallinity, porosity and chemical stability, but lower catalytic activity for hydroboration reactions compared to JNM-1. However, JNM-5 showed higher substrate selectivity and chemo-selectivity for hydroboration of olefins.
Although many efforts have been made to tune catalytic performance via the modification of MOF nodes including metal exchange, defect creation and metal insertion, steric tuning of MOF nodes via ligand modification remains challenging and unexplored. Herein, we have successfully fabricated two two-dimensional (2D) Cu(i) cyclic trinuclear unit (Cu-CTU)-based MOFs with similar structures, denoted as JNM-1 and JNM-5. JNM-1 has less steric hindrance on copper open sites, while JNM-5 incorporates bulky groups enhancing steric hindrance and partial coverage on copper open sites. Due to the steric effect, JNM-5 exhibited much higher crystallinity, porosity and chemical stability, but lower catalytic activity for hydroboration reactions than JNM-1. Interestingly, JNM-5 delivered much higher substrate selectivity and chemo-selectivity for hydroboration of olefins compared to JNM-1. Owing to its high chemical stability, JNM-5 can be reused for at least five cycles without losing catalytic performance and crystallinity, while the catalytic activity of JNM-1 is greatly decreased and it turns into an amorphous material after five cycles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据