4.4 Article

Three P5CS genes including a novel one from Lilium regale play distinct roles in osmotic, drought and salt stress tolerance

期刊

JOURNAL OF PLANT BIOLOGY
卷 59, 期 5, 页码 456-466

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s12374-016-0189-y

关键词

P5CS; Lilium regale; Proline; osmotic stress; drought stress; salt stress

资金

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) [2013AA102706]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation [31470106]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Proline accumulations in abiotically stressed plants is generally considered to benefit their stress tolerance. The Delta(1)-Pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase (P5CS) gene family, which encodes the rate-limiting enzyme in proline biosynthesis pathway, usually contains two duplicated genes in most plants. However, three P5CS genes including LrP5CS1, LrP5CS2 as well as a third one, LrP5CS3, were isolated from Lilium regale. LrP5CS3 is highly identical to LrP5CS1 in amino acid sequences, indicating they could come from a paralogous duplication. The phylogenetic tree suggested that the duplication of LrP5CS occurred independently after the divergence of Liliales and commelinoids. The expression of LrP5CS1 was strongly induced in leaves and roots both under drought and salinity, while that of LrP5CS3 was upregulated more moderately. LrP5CS2 stayed almost constitutive under stress. LrP5CS1 exhibited the highest activity after expressed in E. coli. Overexpression of LrP5CS genes conferred enhanced osmotic, drought and salt tolerance on transgenic Arabidopsis without negative effects in unstressed condition. Under salt stress, lines LrP5CS2 accumulated fewer proline than others, and lines LrP5CS1 grew better in root elongation. The roots of lines LrP5CS3 grew better than all others under unstressed condition and osmotic stress. Our study suggests that the three LrP5CS genes play distinct roles respectively in proline accumulation and abiotic stress tolerance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据