4.3 Article

Confirming the Rapid phosphorus transfer from microorganisms to mesozooplankton in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea scenario through a mesocosm experiment

期刊

JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH
卷 38, 期 3, 页码 502-521

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/plankt/fbw010

关键词

phosphorus cycling; mediterranean; tunnelling-bypass; mesocosm; plankton food web

资金

  1. Norwegian Research Council
  2. European Union Seventh Framework Program [228224]
  3. EU [FP7-ENV-2013-6.1-1, 603773]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

P-transport through the microbial food web was investigated in a mesocosm experiment in which orthophosphate was added to oligotrophic Cretan Sea water. As non-exclusive alternatives to traditional phytoplankton-zooplankton succession, two mechanisms for P-transport have previously been proposed: a stoichiometric shift in food quality (Tunnelling); and a transport through a predatory food chain from heterotrophic bacteria, bypassing phytoplankton (Bypass). Following P-addition, particulate C:P-ratio dropped from 436 to 44(molar) within 1 day, and egg production increased after 2 days. This confirms the hypothesized stoichiometric shift and rapid copepod response of a Tunnelling scenario. Bacterial abundance responded positively to P-addition on Day 1, ciliates increased after Day 5 and new egg production peaks occurred on Days 5 and 9; a succession suggesting additional Bypass transport although the response expected in heterotrophic flagellate abundance was not confirmed. A small, but statistically not significant, increase in Chl a in the 0.6- to 2-mm size fraction also suggests possible additional P-transport through a phytoplankton zooplankton succession. On the basis of the magnitude of the stoichiometric change and the short delay in egg production response, we consider the Tunnelling mechanism to be the most likely signal initiating egg production, but a Bypass, and possibly a traditional succession, may have contributed to maintain the elevated egg production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据