4.6 Article

Human motoneurone excitability is depressed by activation of serotonin 1A receptors with buspirone

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
卷 595, 期 5, 页码 1763-1773

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1113/JP273200

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [1055084]
  2. NHMRC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intense serotonergic drive in the turtle spinal cord results in serotonin spillover to the axon initial segment of themotoneurones where it activates serotonin 1A (5-HT1A) receptors and inhibits generation of action potentials. We examined whether activation of 5-HT1A receptors decreases motoneurone excitability in humans by determining the effects of a 5-HT1A receptor partial agonist, buspirone, on F waves and cervicomedullary motor evoked potentials (CMEPs). In a placebo-controlled double-blind study, 10 participants were tested on two occasions where either placebo or 20 mg of buspirone was administered orally. The ulnar nerve was stimulated supramaximally to evoke F waves in abductor digiti minimi (ADM). CMEPs and the maximal M wave were elicited in biceps brachii by cervicomedullary stimulation and brachial plexus stimulation, respectively. Following buspirone intake, F-wave area and persistence, as well as CMEP area, were significantly decreased. The mean post-pill difference in normalized F-wave areas and persistence between buspirone and placebo days was -27% (-42, -12; 95% confidence interval) and -9% (-16, -2), respectively. The mean post-pill difference in normalized CMEP area between buspirone and placebo days showed greater variation and was -31% (-60, -2). In conclusion, buspirone reduces motoneurone excitability in humans probably via activation of 5-HT1A receptors at the axon initial segment. This has implications for motor output during high drive to the motoneurones when serotonin may spill over to these inhibitory receptors and consequently inhibit motoneurone output. Such a mechanism could potentially contribute to fatigue with exercise.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据