4.7 Article

Multiobjective design optimization of parabolic trough collectors

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-24305-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF)
  2. Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a novel multi-objective optimization model for the design optimization of PTCs, with thermal and exergetic efficiencies being the primary performance indicators. The optimization model effectively maximizes both thermal and exergetic efficiencies, with water and helium achieving the highest optimal values, respectively.
Despite the large amount of research conducted on PTC performance analysis, few and rare numbers of research have considered the design optimization of PTCs. In the present work, a novel multiobjective-optimization model is developed for design optimization of PTCs. The objective functions are the thermal and exergetic efficiencies because they are the most important performance indicators (PIs) of PTCs. The design variables are the inlet temperature, and the outlet and inlet diameters of the PTC receiver tube. The PTC material volume (refers to the volume of the PTC receiver and collector) is kept constant throughout the optimization process to enhance the PTC performance without incurring additional cost (material). A parametric analysis is conducted before the optimization. The inlet-mass flow-rate effect is found to be negligible in contrast to the inlet temperature. Therefore, the latter is considered as a design parameter in the optimization process. Nine thermal fluids are used in the present optimization, which include pressurized water, Therminol, molten salt, liquid sodium, Syltherm, air, carbon dioxide, helium and hydrogen. The present optimization model is found to be efficient in maximizing both the thermal and exergetic efficiencies. Water achieves maximum optimal thermal efficiency, whereas helium achieves maximum optimal exergetic efficiency. Liquid sodium exhibits the best PI (60.725).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据