4.8 Article

A unifying Bayesian framework for merging X-ray diffraction data

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-35280-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences, NIH [P30GM124165]
  2. DOE Office of Science [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  3. Searle Scholarship Program [SSP-2018-3240]
  4. George W. Merck Fund of the New York Community Trust [338034]
  5. NIH457 Director's New Innovator Award [DP2-GM141000]
  6. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship [DGE1745303]
  7. Burroughs Wellcome Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Novel X-ray methods are revolutionizing the study of the functional dynamics of biomolecules by detecting subtle conformational changes. A modern Bayesian solution using deep learning and variational inference is successfully applied to rescale and merge reflection observations, accurately detecting small dynamics and anomalous scattering.
Novel X-ray methods are transforming the study of the functional dynamics of biomolecules. Key to this revolution is detection of often subtle conformational changes from diffraction data. Diffraction data contain patterns of bright spots known as reflections. To compute the electron density of a molecule, the intensity of each reflection must be estimated, and redundant observations reduced to consensus intensities. Systematic effects, however, lead to the measurement of equivalent reflections on different scales, corrupting observation of changes in electron density. Here, we present a modern Bayesian solution to this problem, which uses deep learning and variational inference to simultaneously rescale and merge reflection observations. We successfully apply this method to monochromatic and polychromatic single-crystal diffraction data, as well as serial femtosecond crystallography data. We find that this approach is applicable to the analysis of many types of diffraction experiments, while accurately and sensitively detecting subtle dynamics and anomalous scattering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据