4.8 Article

A call for immediate action to increase COVID-19 vaccination uptake to prepare for the third pandemic winter

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-34995-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme
  2. European Union [964728, 101018210, 965280, 101018353, 101018349]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article summarises the current challenges of routine vaccine uptake during the COVID-19 pandemic and provides recommendations to increase uptake. It also points out evidence-based resources to support healthcare workers, policy makers, and communicators.
This Comment piece summarises current challenges regarding routine vaccine uptake in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and provides recommendations on how to increase uptake. To implement these recommendations, the article points to evidence-based resources that can support health-care workers, policy makers and communicators.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

Article Psychology

Heterogeneity of rules in Bayesian reasoning: A toolbox analysis

Jan K. Woike, Ralph Hertwig, Gerd Gigerenzer

Summary: This study aimed to test two competing theoretical views on how people infer the Bayesian posterior probability: single-process theories and toolbox theories. Through analyzing data from a large number of participants, little support was found for the tested single-process theories. However, simulations showed that a single process, the weighing-and-adding model, could best fit the aggregate data and achieve the best out-of-sample prediction. Testing five non-Bayesian rules plus Bayes's rule, a toolbox was found to capture 64% of the inferences.

COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY (2023)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Tailoring interventions to suit self-reported format preference does not decrease vaccine hesitancy

Karl Maeki, Linda Karlsson, Johanna Kaakinen, Philipp Schmid, Stephan Lewandowsky, Jan Antfolk, Anna Soveri

Summary: According to two studies, individually tailored vaccine hesitancy interventions based on people's format preference may not be effective in decreasing vaccine hesitancy. Regardless of whether individuals received interventions in their preferred format, it did not influence their vaccine attitudes or intentions. Furthermore, individuals with a stronger preference for anecdotal information found both statistical and anecdotal interventions more frustrating, less relevant, and less helpful. However, the reactions to statistical interventions were consistently less negative than anecdotal interventions, suggesting that using statistics-only interventions may be a less risky option when targeting individuals with anti-vaccination attitudes.

PLOS ONE (2023)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Resolving content moderation dilemmas between free speech and harmful misinformation

Anastasia Kozyreva, Stefan M. Herzog, Stephan Lewandowsky, Ralph Hertwig, Philipp Lorenz-Spreen, Mark Leiser, Jason Reifler

Summary: In online content moderation, protecting freedom of expression and preventing harm are conflicting values. Little is known about people's judgments and preferences in content moderation. We conducted a survey experiment with US respondents to understand their attitudes towards problematic social media posts on various topics. The majority prioritize removing harmful misinformation over protecting free speech. Partisan differences were observed, with Republicans being less willing to remove posts or penalize accounts across all scenarios. Our findings can inform the design of transparent content moderation rules for harmful misinformation.

PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2023)

Editorial Material Communication

Science Communication as a Collective Intelligence Endeavor: A Manifesto and Examples for Implementation

Dawn Holford, Angelo Fasce, Katy Tapper, Miso Demko, Stephan Lewandowsky, Ulrike Hahn, Christoph M. Abels, Ahmed Al-Rawi, Sameer Alladin, T. Sonia Boender, Hendrik Bruns, Helen Fischer, Christian Gilde, Paul H. P. Hanel, Stefan M. Herzog, Astrid Kause, Sune Lehmann, Matthew S. Nurse, Caroline Orr, Niccolo Pescetelli, Maria Petrescu, Sunita Sah, Philipp Schmid, Miroslav Sirota, Marlene Wulf

Summary: A new program of science communication as collective intelligence is needed, supported by technology, to ensure more accurate, comprehensive, flexible, and diverse scientific messages.

SCIENCE COMMUNICATION (2023)

Article Immunology

International adaptation and validation of the Pro-VC-Be: measuring the psychosocial determinants of vaccine confidence in healthcare professionals in European countries

Amanda Garrison, Linda Karlsson, Lisa Fressard, Angelo Fasce, Fernanda Rodrigues, Philipp Schmid, Frederike Taubert, Dawn Holford, Stephan Lewandowsky, Peter Nynaes, Emma C. Anderson, Arnaud Gagneur, Eve Dube, Anna Soveri, Pierre Verger

Summary: The purpose of this study was to validate the long and short versions of the International Professionals' Vaccine Confidence and Behaviors questionnaire among healthcare professionals in European countries. The study found that the questionnaire had good reliability and validity among healthcare professionals in four European countries. This is important for research and public health work.

EXPERT REVIEW OF VACCINES (2023)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Psychological profiles of anti-vaccination argument endorsement

Dawn L. Holford, Angelo Fasce, Thomas H. Costello, Stephan Lewandowsky

Summary: The proliferation of anti-vaccination arguments online poses a threat to immunization programs. Communicators need to understand the motivations behind these views and consider psychological attributes that lead to vaccine hesitancy. Results from a study in the UK showed that endorsement of anti-vaccination arguments is related to anti-scientific beliefs and partisan ideologies, with individual differences in attitude balance. Communicators should be aware of these differences to effectively address vaccine hesitancy.

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS (2023)

Article Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology

Endorsement of alternative medicine and vaccine hesitancy among physicians: A cross-sectional study in four European countries

Angelo Fasce, Linda Karlsson, Pierre Verger, Otto Maeki, Frederike Taubert, Amanda Garrison, Philipp Schmid, Dawn Liu Holford, Stephan Lewandowsky, Fernanda Rodrigues, Cornelia Betsch, Anna Soveri

Summary: This study analyzed the relationship between endorsement of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and vaccination attitudes and behaviors among healthcare professionals in four European countries. The results showed that CAM endorsement is associated with lower frequency of vaccine recommendation, lower self-vaccination rates, and being more open to patients delaying vaccination, mediated by distrust in vaccines. A significant percentage of healthcare professionals exhibited high CAM endorsement and low confidence and recommendation of vaccines, varying across countries. These findings highlight the importance of considering healthcare professionals' attitudes toward CAM in immunization campaigns.

HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS (2023)

Review Psychology, Biological

A taxonomy of anti-vaccination arguments from a systematic literature review and text modelling

Angelo Fasce, Philipp Schmid, Dawn L. Holford, Luke Bates, Iryna Gurevych, Stephan Lewandowsky

Summary: This article presents a taxonomy linking anti-vaccination arguments to their psychological roots, developed through a systematic literature review and natural language processing methods. The taxonomy provides a theoretical framework for understanding the underlying motives behind opposition to vaccines, enabling targeted rebuttals and interventions. Validation was performed on anti-vaccination misinformation related to coronavirus disease 2019.

NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR (2023)

Article Psychology, Experimental

Rationally Irrational: When People Do Not Correct Their Reasoning Errors Even If They Could

Miroslav Sirota, Marie Juanchich, Dawn L. Holford

Summary: Why do people sometimes fail to correct their reasoning errors? The dominant dual-process theories of reasoning explain how people detect their reasoning errors, but they do not provide sufficient explanation for how people decide to correct these errors. Through research on cognitive control, we have explored the motivational aspects of the correction process. We argue that people decide whether or not to correct an error based on the overall expected value associated with the correction, taking into consideration the perceived efficacy, reward, and effort cost.

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL (2023)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

Challenges in Understanding Human-Algorithm Entanglement During Online Information Consumption

Stephan Lewandowsky, Ronald E. Robertson, Renee DiResta

Summary: This article examines the interaction between social media platforms, search engines, and human behavior in relation to curated online content. It emphasizes that the interactions people have with algorithms not only shape their experiences in the moment but also have long-term effects through modifications of the underlying social-network structure. However, understanding these interactions is challenging due to the lack of access to relevant platform data for researchers. The article argues that increased transparency, data sharing, and protections for external researchers are necessary to better understand the entanglement between humans and algorithms.

PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2023)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Planning Engagement With Web Resources to Improve Diet Quality and Break Up Sedentary Time for Home-Working Employees: A Mixed Methods Study

Dawn Holford, Gianluca Tognon, Valerie Gladwell, Kelly Murray, Mark Nicoll, Angela Knox, Rachel McCloy, Vanessa Loaiza

Summary: With the increasing prevalence of home working, employers face challenges in providing health promotion interventions. This study shows that incorporating action planning can increase employee engagement with web-based self-help resources. Participants reported that the plan helped them to easily engage with the resources and fit exercises and meals around work tasks. However, lack of time and concerns about colleagues' perceptions were barriers to resource uptake.

JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY (2023)

Article Health Policy & Services

Workplace Violence Against Nurses: Challenges and Solutions for Europe

Paul de Raeve, Andreas Xyrichis, Francesco Bolzonella, Jochen Bergs, Patricia M. Davidson

Summary: The European Federation of Nurses (EFN) conducted a mapping exercise on the challenges and solutions related to violence against nurses. The results revealed that violent incidents against nurses are often under-reported due to various reasons such as fear of victimization and discouragement from employers. The perpetrators of violence include not only patients and their families but also health professionals of different ranks. Violent incidents have a significant adverse effect on nurses' health and job retention.

POLICY POLITICS & NURSING PRACTICE (2023)

Article Psychology, Biological

The real cause of our complicity: The preoccupation with human weakness

Ralph Hertwig

Summary: Chater & Loewenstein criticize how behavioral sciences and public policy align with corporations to blame public health and societal issues on individual weaknesses, thus diverting attention from systemic reforms. However, their analysis fails to adequately hold the field accountable for its excessive focus on human irrationality and weaknesses.

BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES (2023)

Article Psychology, Applied

The citizen choice architect in an ultra-processed world

Ralph Hertwig

Summary: Two concepts of Mill's harm principle and the distinction between public and private spheres should be revisited in today's 'ultra-processed' world, where advanced technologies exploit human psychology and jeopardize citizens' well-being. Systemic interventions like regulation and taxation are necessary to minimize harm, which should be supplemented with interventions informed by behavioral science that guide individual behaviors. Empowering individuals to self-nudge, rather than paternalistic nudging, allows them to design their own decision environments and choice architectures.

BEHAVIOURAL PUBLIC POLICY (2023)

Article Psychology, Applied

Trait reactance as psychological motivation to reject vaccination: Two longitudinal studies and one experimental study

Anna Soveri, Linda C. Karlsson, Karl O. Maki, Dawn Holford, Angelo Fasce, Philipp Schmid, Jan Antfolk, Linnea Karlsson, Hasse Karlsson, Saara Nolvi, Max Karukivi, Mikael Lindfelt, Stephan Lewandowsky

Summary: This study investigates the impact of psychological motives on vaccine refusal. The longitudinal studies suggest that individuals with higher trait reactance are less willing to get vaccinated during the COVID-19 pandemic. The experimental study shows that highly reactant individuals' willingness to vaccinate is unaffected by the amount and framing of the information provided.

APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-HEALTH AND WELL BEING (2023)

暂无数据