4.6 Article

Fabrication of biologically inspired electrospun collagen/silk fibroin/bioactive glass composited nanofibrous to accelerate the treatment efficiency of wound repair

期刊

INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL
卷 20, 期 3, 页码 687-698

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13910

关键词

bioactive glass; collagen; electrospun; silk fibroin; tri-layer composite; wound repair antibacterial

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A triple-layer composite material with nanofibrous and porous structure was fabricated using electrospinning and freeze-drying systems, showing promising physical and biological properties for soft-tissue engineering. Cell studies demonstrated excellent cell adherence and proliferation on the composite layers, suggesting its potential for skin-tissue-engineering applications.
A triple-layer matrix Collagen/Silk fibroin/Bioactive glass composited Nanofibrous was fabricated by linking electrospinning and freeze-drying systems, this typical three layered composite with a nanofibrous fragment as the key (top) layer, middle portion as inferior, and a spongy porous fragment as the third (bottom) deposit to develop the synergistic effect of composite materials resultant to physical and biological performances. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and scanning electron microscopy were used to assess the final material's physicochemical properties (SEM). The triple-layer matrix had a nanofibrous and porous structure, which has qualities including high porosity, swelling, and stability, which are important in soft-tissue engineering. NIH 3 T3 fibroblast and humanoid keratinocyte (HaCaT) cell lines were also used to investigate the matrix's in vitro biological and fluorescent capabilities, which showed excellent cell adherence and proliferation across the composite layers. The synergistic arrangement of nanofibrous substantial deposition onto collagenous with silk fibroin candidates has therefore proven effective in the construction of a tri-layer matrix for skin-tissue-engineering applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据