4.6 Article

Classification of Liquid Ingress in GFRP Honeycomb Based on One-Dimension Sequential Model Using THz-TDS

期刊

SENSORS
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s23031149

关键词

GFRP; liquid ingress; defects classification; THz-TDS; one-dimension sequential model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Honeycomb structure composites are widely used in aircraft manufacturing due to their high strength-to-weight ratio, good fatigue resistance, and low manufacturing cost, but the hollow structure is susceptible to liquid ingress. In this study, a fast and automatic liquid classification method for water, alcohol, and oil filled in glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) honeycomb structures was proposed using terahertz time-domain spectroscopy (THz-TDS). An improved one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) model was developed and compared with long short-term memory (LSTM) and ordinary 1D-CNN models. The results showed that the LSTM model performed the best for time-domain signals, while the improved 1D-CNN model had the best performance for frequency-domain signals.
Honeycomb structure composites are taking an increasing proportion in aircraft manufacturing because of their high strength-to-weight ratio, good fatigue resistance, and low manufacturing cost. However, the hollow structure is very prone to liquid ingress. Here, we report a fast and automatic classification approach for water, alcohol, and oil filled in glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) honeycomb structures through terahertz time-domain spectroscopy (THz-TDS). We propose an improved one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) model, and compared it with long short-term memory (LSTM) and ordinary 1D-CNN models, which are classification networks based on one dimension sequenced signals. The automated liquid classification results show that the LSTM model has the best performance for the time-domain signals, while the improved 1D-CNN model performed best for the frequency-domain signals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据