4.4 Review

Is the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio a prognostic factor in non-small cell lung cancer patients who receive adjuvant chemotherapy?

期刊

SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY
卷 49, 期 6, 页码 482-489

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2023.01.006

关键词

NLR; Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio; Lung cancer; Prognostic marker

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inflammation plays a key role in malignant tumor progression. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an indicator of systemic inflammation and high NLR before treatment has been associated with worse long-term outcomes in some studies. We summarize the data on the use of NLR as a prognostic factor and present the results of a single institution study evaluating the usefulness of high preoperative NLR as a prognostic factor in patients with resected NSCLC who receive adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Our study, along with existing literature, supports the use of preoperative NLR as a reliable and cost-effective biomarker for estimating prognosis in NSCLC patients.
Inflammation plays a key role in malignant tumor progression. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a marker of systemic inflammation and, as such, high isolated pretreatment NLR has been shown in some studies to be associated with worse long-term outcomes. We summarize the data regarding the utility of NLR as a prognosis factor and present results of a single institution study assessing the usefulness of high preoperative NLR as a prognosis factor for patients with successfully resected NSCLC who receive adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy. While largely supportive of the value of NLR as a prognostic fac-tor, the literature is not consistent and suggest a more nuanced association. Our single institution study adds to the exiting literature. We conclude preoperative NLR can be used as a reliable, cost-effective biomarker to estimate prognosis in NSCLC patients who have undergone lung lobectomy with curative intent followed by cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy.(c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据