4.8 Article

Operational Regimes in Picosecond and Femtosecond Pulse-Excited Ultrahigh Vacuum SERS

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
卷 7, 期 15, 页码 2971-2976

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b01151

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation Center for Chemical Innovation [CHE-1414466]
  2. Department of Energy Office of Basic Energy Sciences (SISGR) [DE-FG02-09ER16109]
  3. NSF [CHE-1465201]
  4. National Science Foundation Materials Research Science and Engineering Center [DMR-1121262]
  5. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship [DGE-1324585]
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1414466] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Division Of Chemistry [1414466] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Division Of Chemistry
  9. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1465201] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report a systematic study performed in ultrahigh vacuum designed to identify the laser excitation regimes in which plasmonically enhanced ultrashort pulses may be used to nondestructively probe surface-bound molecules. A nondestructive, continuous-wave spectroscopic probe is used to monitor the effects of four different femtosecond- and picosecond-pulsed beams on the SER signals emanating from molecular analytes residing within plasmonically enhanced fields. We identify the roles of plasmonic amplification and alignment with a molecular electronic transition on the observed changes in the SER signals. Our results indicate that overlap of the laser wavelength with the plasmon resonance is the dominant contributor to signal degradation. In addition, signal loss for a given irradiation condition is observed only for molecules residing in hot spots above a threshold enhancement. Identification of suitable laser energy density ranges demonstrates the importance of considering these parameters when implementing SERS in the presence of pulsed irradiation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据