4.7 Review

The microbiota and the gut-liver axis in primary sclerosing cholangitis

期刊

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41575-022-00690-y

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This Review explores the links between Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and the mechanisms related to the gut-liver axis. It is found that the gut microbiota in people with PSC differs from that of healthy individuals, but the specific microbial factors that differentiate PSC from IBD without PSC are poorly understood. The potential existence of a specific unknown factor related to the gut-liver axis as a cause of PSC is postulated.
Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is closely associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and potentially provides unique insights into the gut-liver axis. This Review explores these links and provides an overview of the gut microbiome in PSC, including PSC-IBD, exploring related hypotheses of disease mechanisms. Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) offers unique opportunities to explore the gut-liver axis owing to the close association between liver disease and colonic inflammation. It is well established that the gut microbiota in people with PSC differs from that of healthy individuals, but details of the microbial factors that demarcate PSC from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) without PSC are poorly understood. In this Review, we aim to provide an overview of the latest literature on the gut microbiome in PSC and PSC with IBD, critically examining hypotheses on how microorganisms could contribute to the pathogenesis of PSC. A particular emphasis will be put on pathogenic features of the gut microbiota that might explain the occurrence of bile duct inflammation and liver disease in the context of IBD, and we postulate the potential existence of a specific yet unknown factor related to the gut-liver axis as causative in PSC. Available data are scrutinized in the perspective of therapeutic approaches related to the gut-liver axis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据