4.8 Article

Regulating the coordination geometry of polyhedra in zero-dimensional metal halides for tunable emission

期刊

NANOSCALE
卷 15, 期 11, 页码 5241-5248

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2nr06975j

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, single crystals of bimetallic materials were successfully synthesized, with strong self-trapped exciton emissions. The introduction of Zn2+ and Mn2+ effectively altered the coordination geometry of the lead bromide polyhedral configuration, resulting in a red shift and broader emission peak. The PbMn-Br single crystals showed an impressive tunable emission and high photoluminescence quantum yield.
Although self-trapped exciton (STE) emissions in zero-dimensional metal halides have been intensively investigated, the understanding of the relationship between the coordination geometries of the metal halides and their photophysical properties is still lacking. In this work, we successfully synthesized single crystals, with strong STE emissions, of the bimetallic materials (Bmpip)(9)[Pb3Br11](ZnBr4)(2) (PbZn-Br) and (Bmpip)(9)[Pb3Br11](MnBr4)(2) (PbMn-Br), where Bmpip(+) is 1-butyl-1-methyl-piperidinium (C10H22N+), via a facile anti-solvent crystallization strategy. With respect to the monometallic material, (Bmpip)(2)[PbBr4] (Pb-Br), the introduction of Zn2+ and Mn2+ effectively alters the coordination geometry of the lead bromide polyhedral configuration from a PbBr42- tetrahedron to a Pb3Br115- trimer. As a result, the maximum emission peak of PbZn-Br exhibits an obvious red shift and the full width at half maximum is almost two-fold wider than that of Pb-Br due to stronger electron-phonon coupling. Moreover, due to the intrinsic emission of the Mn2+ ions, an intriguing tunable emission was achieved in PbMn-Br with an impressively high photoluminescence quantum yield of up to 67%. The ultra-stable PbMn-Br single crystals show potential as an ideal down-conversion phosphor for use in UV-pumped white light-emitting diode devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据