4.5 Article

SPECIES DELIMITATION AND PHYLOGEOGRAPHIC ANALYSES IN THE ECTOCARPUS SUBGROUP SILICULOSI (ECTOCARPALES, PHAEOPHYCEAE)

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYCOLOGY
卷 53, 期 1, 页码 17-31

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jpy.12452

关键词

barcode; brown alga; COI-5P; cryptic species; Ectocarpus; hybridization; introgression; ITS1; species delimitation

资金

  1. CONICYT
  2. IDEALG (France) [ANR-10-BTBR-04]
  3. INRA-MNHN-INEE-CNRS
  4. Bi-Cycle (France) [ANR10- BLAN-1727]
  5. EU FP7 [227799]
  6. EU Interreg program France (Channel)-England
  7. TOTAL Foundation
  8. Ray- Lankester Fellowship (UK)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The genus Ectocarpus (Ectocarpales, Phaeophyceae) contains filamentous algae widely distributed in marine and estuarine habitats of temperate regions in both hemispheres. While E. siliculosus has become a model organism for genomics and genetics of the brown macroalgae, accurate species delineation, distribution patterns and diversity for the genus Ectocarpus remain problematic. In this study, we used three independent species delimitation approaches to generate a robust species hypothesis for 729 Ectocarpus specimens collected mainly along the European and Chilean coasts. These approaches comprised phylogenetic reconstructions and two bioinformatics tools developed to objectively define species boundaries (General Mixed Yule Coalescence Method and Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery). Our analyses were based on DNA sequences of two loci: the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 and the nuclear internal transcribed spacer 1 of the ribosomal DNA. Our analyses showed the presence of at least 15 cryptic species and suggest the existence of incomplete lineage sorting or introgression between five of them. These results suggested the possible existence of different levels of reproductive barriers within this species complex. We also detected differences among species in their phylogeographic patterns, range and depth distributions, which may suggest different biogeographic histories (e.g., endemic species or recent introductions).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据