4.4 Article

Biodistribution, hypouricemic efficacy and therapeutic mechanism of morin phospholipid complex loaded self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery systems in an experimental hyperuricemic model in rats

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACOLOGY
卷 68, 期 1, 页码 14-25

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/jphp.12492

关键词

hyperuricemic; morin phospholipid complex; renal organic ion transporter; self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery system; xanthine oxidase

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2013CB932504]
  2. National S & T Major Project of China [2012ZX09304004001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectivesThis study aimed to compare the biodistribution and hypouricemic efficacy of morin and morin-phospholipid complex loaded self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery systems (MPC-SNEDDS), as well as to explore their therapeutic mechanisms. MethodsWe studied the biodistribution of morin and MPC-SNEDDS after they were orally administered to rats. The hypouricemic efficacy and the therapeutic mechanisms of morin and MPC-SNEDDS were evaluated using potassium oxonate-induced hyperuricemic model in rats. Key findingsWith enhanced morin concentration in liver and kidney, oral delivery of MPC-SNEDDS exhibited significantly stronger urate-lowering effect in hyperuricemic rats than morin. The hypouricemic efficacy of morin was due to reduced production of uric acid via inhibiting the mRNA expression of hepatic xanthine dehydrogenase/xanthine oxidase (XDH/XO), as well as decreased urate reabsorption via modulating the alteration of mRNA levels of glucose transporter (mGLUT9), renal organic anion transporter 1 (mOAT1) and uric acid transporter (mURAT1). MPC-SNEDDS dually inhibited mRNA expression and activity of hepatic XDH/XO and restored the dysregulation of renal mGLUT9, mOAT1 and mURAT1, contributing to its superior urate-lowering efficacy. ConclusionThe results demonstrated the great potential of MPC-SNEDDS as an alternative oral strategy for active agents in treating hyperuricemia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据