4.0 Article

Circadian gating of light-induced arousal in Drosophila sleep

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROGENETICS
卷 37, 期 1-2, 页码 36-46

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01677063.2022.2151596

关键词

Drosophila melanogaster; circadian rhythms; sleep; light; arousal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates that circadian clocks regulate light-induced arousal in Drosophila sleep behavior. The arousal effects are mediated by glutamate transmission from octopaminergic neurons and are masked by light. Different groups of circadian pacemaker neurons are involved in light-induced arousal and free-running behavioral rhythms. These findings provide convincing evidence for circadian control of sleep.
Circadian rhythms and sleep homeostasis constitute the two-process model for daily sleep regulation. However, evidence for circadian control of sleep-wake cycles has been relatively short since clock-less animals often show sleep behaviors quantitatively comparable to wild-type. Here we examine Drosophila sleep behaviors under different light-dark regimes and demonstrate that circadian clocks gate light-induced arousal. Genetic excitation of tyrosine decarboxylase 2 (TDC2)-expressing neurons suppressed sleep more evidently at night, causing nocturnal activity. The arousal effects were likely mediated in part by glutamate transmission from the octopaminergic neurons and substantially masked by light. Application of T12 cycles (6-h light: 6-h dark) further showed that the light-sensitive effects of TDC2 neurons depended on the time of the day. In particular, light-sensing via visual input pathway led to strong sleep suppression at subjective night, and such an effect disappeared in clock-less mutants. Transgenic mapping revealed that light-induced arousal and free-running behavioral rhythms require distinct groups of circadian pacemaker neurons. These results provide convincing evidence that circadian control of sleep is mediated by the dedicated clock neurons for light-induced arousal.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据