4.7 Article

High-permeance Mg2+/Li+ separation nanofiltration membranes intensified by quadruple imidazolium salts

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 667, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2022.121178

关键词

Nanofiltration; Mg 2+; Li plus separation; Quadruple imidazolium; Charge intensification

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates that charge intensification of loose structure nanofiltration membranes can achieve high flux and selective separation of Mg2+/Li+ mixtures. A new electrolyte monomer (QTHIM) was synthesized to modify the polyethyleneimine-based polyamide membranes (PEI-TMC), resulting in a high-permeance nanofiltration membrane (PEI-TMC-QTHIM). The modified membrane exhibited loose structures, enhanced positive charge, high water permeance (-33 L m-2 h-1 bar-1), good MgCl2 rejection (-92%), and high flux for a mixture with a Mg2+/Li+ ratio of 100 (-170 L m-2 h-1). Notably, the flux of the modified membrane was approximately 6 times higher than that of the original membrane.
Nanofiltration represents an efficient technology for mono/divalent ions separation, such as Mg2+/Li + mixtures which are crucial for lithium extraction from salt lakes. This work shows that charge intensification of loose structure nanofiltration membranes is an effective way to reconcile high flux with Mg2+/Li+ selectivity. A new electrolyte monomer (QTHIM) containing quadruple imidazolium and hydroxyl groups was synthesized to react with residual acyl chloride groups on the nascent polyethyleneimine-based polyamide membranes (PEI-TMC), leading to the formation of a high-permeance nanofiltration membrane (PEI-TMC-QTHIM). The modified membrane highlights loose structures combined with enhanced positive charge, exhibiting high water permeance (-33 L m-2 h-1 bar- 1), good MgCl2 rejection (-92%) and high flux to 100 Mg2+/Li+ ratio mixture (-170 L m- 2 h-1). Notably, flux of the modified membrane is ca. 6 times as high as that of the nascent membrane.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据