4.2 Article

Chemical Composition, in vitro Antioxidant, and Antidiabetic Potential of Essential Oil from Flowers of Rhaponticoides iconiensis

期刊

JOURNAL OF ESSENTIAL OIL BEARING PLANTS
卷 25, 期 6, 页码 1281-1288

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/0972060X.2022.2158761

关键词

Asteraceae; Digestive enzymes; Antioxidant; GC; MS

资金

  1. Erciyes University Scientific Research Projects Coordinating Unit [TLO-2021-11464]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study describes the in vitro antidiabetic activity, antioxidant capacity, and phytochemical analysis of essential oil from Rhaponticoides iconiensis flowers. The essential oil exhibited potential antidiabetic and antioxidant activity, making it a promising candidate for further investigation.
The present study describes in vitro antidiabetic activity, antioxidant capacity and phytochemical analyses of essential oil from flower of Rhaponticoides iconiensis (Hub.-Mor.) M.V.Agab. & Greuter. In this study, the antidiabetic activity of essential oil was carried out by alpha-amylase and alpha-glucosidase enzyme inhibition methods, the antioxidant activity was investigated with DPPH?, ABTS(?+) and FRAP tests and the phytochemical composition analysis was carried out by GC/MS and GC-FID. According to the results, the highest alpha-amylase and ABTS(+?) activity even from positive control were found in essential oil (IC50=154.33 +/- 3.88 mu g/mL and at a concentration of 0.25 mg/mL equivalent to 0.607 +/- 0.95 mu M Trolox, respectively). Moreover, the highest antioxidant activity on FRAP (at a concentration of 1 mg/mL equivalent to 508.50 +/- 1.057 mmol Fe2+) and moderate effect on DPPH? (33.10%) tests were observed. Besides that, the results of GC/MS analyses of essential oil revealed the presence of 1-undecene, gamma-eudesmol and beta-caryophyllene as a major compounds. In conclusion, the essential oil from this species has potential antidiabetic and antioxidant activity and these activities may be investigated in detail in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据