4.7 Article

SARS-CoV-2 RdRp uses NDPs as a substrate and is able to incorporate NHC into RNA from diphosphate form molnupiravir

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.12.112

关键词

Molnupiravir; Nucleoside diphosphate; RNA dependent RNA polymerase; SARS-CoV-2

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The coronavirus disease 2019 has caused significant harm to global health and economy for three years. Research on the viral RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) complex reveals its potential as a target for antiviral drug development. The study found that RdRp can efficiently synthesize RNA using nucleoside diphosphates as substrates and can incorporate molnupiravir diphosphate, leading to genome mutation and virus death. The diphosphate form of molnupiravir is shown to be a better substrate for RdRp than the triphosphate form, providing a new drug design strategy.
The coronavirus disease 2019 has been ravaging throughout the world for three years and has severely impaired both human health and the economy. The causative agent, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 employs the viral RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) complex for genome replication and transcription, making RdRp an appealing target for antiviral drug development. Systematic characterization of RdRp will undoubtedly aid in the development of antiviral drugs targeting RdRp. Here, our research reveals that RdRp can recognize and utilize nucleoside diphosphates as a substrate to synthesize RNA with an efficiency of about two thirds of using nucleoside triphosphates as a substrate. Nucleoside diphosphates incorporation is also template -specific and has high fidelity. Moreover, RdRp can incorporate beta-d-N4-hydroxycytidine into RNA while using diphosphate form molnupiravir as a substrate. This incorporation results in genome mutation and virus death. It is also observed that diphosphate form molnupiravir is a better substrate for RdRp than the triphosphate form molnupiravir, presenting a new strategy for drug design.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据