4.5 Article

Synthesis, structure and anticancer activity of (η6-benzene) ruthenium(II) complexes containing aroylhydrazone ligands

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORGANOMETALLIC CHEMISTRY
卷 807, 期 -, 页码 45-51

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2016.01.033

关键词

Aroylhydrazone; Benzene ruthenium(II) complex; Molecular structure; Redox behaviour; Cytotoxicity; Apoptosis

资金

  1. University Grants Commission (UGC), New Delhi
  2. CSIR, New Delhi [02 (0142)/13/EMR-II]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

New benzene ruthenium(II) aroylhydrazone complexes of general molecular formula [Ru(eta(6)-C6H6)Cl(L)] (where L = aroylhydrazone ligand) have been synthesized from the reaction of the precursor [Ru(eta(6)-C6H6)(mu-Cl)Cl](2) and aroylhydrazone ligands. The composition of the complexes has been accomplished by elemental analysis and spectral methods (FT-IR, UV-Vis, H-1 NMR). The molecular structure of complex 4 has been established by single-crystal X-ray structure analysis shows that the aroylhydrazone ligands are coordinated to ruthenium as a bidentate N, O donor and a typical piano stool geometry was observed around ruthenium(II) metal center. All the complexes exhibit two consecutive irreversible oxidations in the potential range +0.74 to +1.17 V (Ru-II/Ru-III; Ru-III/Ru-IV) Vs calomel electrode. Further, in vitro anticancer activity of complexes 1-4 on human breast cancer cell line (MCF-7), human cervical cancer cell line (HeLa) and non-cancerous NIH-3T3 cell line exhibit moderate to excellent cytotoxic activity. It is also evident from IC50 values that the complexes are more potent against MCF-7 cells than cisplatin. The superior activity of the complex 4 assumes that presence of electron donating methoxy substituent which makes the ring more reactive. Further, the morphological changes during cell death were investigated by Acridine Orange-Ethidium Bromide (AO-EB) and DAPI staining techniques, which confirm the complex 4 induces cell death only through apoptosis. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据