4.7 Article

Integrating climate-change refugia into 30 by 30 conservation planning in North America

期刊

FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
卷 21, 期 2, 页码 77-84

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/fee.2592

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Countries have set targets to protect natural areas, known as 30 by 30, to mitigate biodiversity loss. However, there is a lack of strategic conservation planning that aligns these targets with climate-change refugia. In North America, less than 15% of refugia are protected, but there is potential for expansion if the warming is limited to 2 degrees C.
Countries have set targets for conserving natural areas to mitigate biodiversity loss, such as the protection of 30% of lands by 2030, commonly referred to as 30 by 30. Yet strategic conservation planning to align those targets with climate-change refugia is lacking. We investigated the feasibility of achieving 30 by 30 in North America by assessing the proportions of state/provincial/territorial land projected to provide refugia for terrestrial biodiversity and the proportions of those refugia that are currently protected. We also conducted a reserve selection prioritization to identify priority areas that complement the current protected area network and capture refugia for seven taxonomic groups. In North America, <15% of refugia are protected, but ample opportunity exists to expand protection if warming is limited to 2 degrees C. Beyond 2 degrees C, however, the majority of refugia will occur only at high latitudes and elevations. Incorporation of refugia into 30 by 30 efforts will facilitate species persistence under climate change.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

Article Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications

Producing Policy-relevant Science by Enhancing Robustness and Model Integration for the Assessment of Global Environmental Change

R. F. Warren, N. R. Edwards, F. Babonneau, P. M. Bacon, J. P. Dietrich, R. W. Ford, P. Garthwaite, D. Gerten, S. Goswami, A. Haurie, K. Hiscock, P. B. Holden, M. R. Hyde, S. R. Joshi, A. Kanudia, M. Labriet, M. Leimbach, O. K. Oyebamiji, T. Osborn, B. Pizzileo, A. Popp, J. Price, G. D. Riley, S. Schaphoff, P. Slavin, M. Vielle, C. Wallace

ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE (2019)

Review Multidisciplinary Sciences

The human imperative of stabilizing global climate change at 1.5°C

O. Hoegh-Guldberg, D. Jacob, M. Taylor, T. Guillen Bolanos, M. Bindi, S. Brown, I. A. Camilloni, A. Diedhiou, R. Djalante, K. Ebi, F. Engelbrecht, J. Guiot, Y. Hijioka, S. Mehrotra, C. W. Hope, A. J. Payne, H. -O. Poertner, S. I. Seneviratne, A. Thomas, R. Warren, G. Zhou

SCIENCE (2019)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Investigating the potential impact of 1.5, 2 and 3 °C global warming levels on crop suitability and planting season over West Africa

Temitope Samuel Egbebiyi, Olivier Crespo, Christopher Lennard, Modathir Zaroug, Grigory Nikulin, Ian Harris, Jeff Price, Nicole Forstenhaeusler, Rachel Warren

Article Environmental Sciences

Evaluating heat extremes in the UK Climate Projections (UKCP18)

A. T. Kennedy-Asser, O. Andrews, D. M. Mitchell, R. F. Warren

Summary: The UKCP18 simulations generally perform as well as or better than CMIP5 models in reproducing observed spatial patterns of UK climate relating to extreme heat, with RMSE values on average similar to 30% less than for the CMIP5 models. Increasing spatial resolution in UKCP18 simulations is shown to yield a minor improvement in model performance compared to observations.

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS (2021)

Article Environmental Sciences

Global costs of protecting against sea-level rise at 1.5 to 4.0 °C

Sally Brown, Katie Jenkins, Philip Goodwin, Daniel Lincke, Athanasios T. Vafeidis, Richard S. J. Tol, Rhosanna Jenkins, Rachel Warren, Robert J. Nicholls, Svetlana Jevrejeva, Agustin Sanchez Arcilla, Ivan D. Haigh

Summary: This paper quantifies the economic costs of flooding and protection due to sea-level rise across different warming levels and socio-economic scenarios. It shows that annual sea flood damage costs are more influenced by socio-economic development than sea-level rise. Low income countries could reduce flood costs by protecting now, but without further adaptation, they will face growing risks and costs.

CLIMATIC CHANGE (2021)

Article Environmental Sciences

Economic impacts of climate-induced crop yield changes: evidence from agri-food industries in six countries

Daoping Wang, Katie Jenkins, Nicole Forstenhausler, Tianyang Lei, Jeff Price, Rachel Warren, Rhosanna Jenkins, Dabo Guan

Summary: This study assesses the economic impacts of different warming scenarios on rice and wheat yields in several countries, with findings showing positive effects on GDP and welfare in China at lower warming levels, but negative impacts in other countries due to declining crop yields and increasing prices. The method used in the study provides a more in-depth understanding of the global market response and regional consequences of agricultural impacts.

CLIMATIC CHANGE (2021)

Article Environmental Sciences

Assessing the economic impacts of future fluvial flooding in six countries under climate change and socio-economic development

Zhiqiang Yin, Yixin Hu, Katie Jenkins, Yi He, Nicole Forstenhausler, Rachel Warren, Lili Yang, Rhosanna Jenkins, Dabo Guan

Summary: This study presents an integrated flood risk analysis framework for Brazil, China, India, Egypt, Ethiopia, and Ghana, calculating the economic damages of fluvial flooding at different warming levels. The research emphasizes the importance of including socio-economic development when estimating direct and indirect flood losses, and highlights China and India as the countries with the largest total flood losses in absolute terms.

CLIMATIC CHANGE (2021)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Addressing risks to biodiversity arising from a changing climate: The need for ecosystem restoration in the Tana River Basin, Kenya

Rhosanna L. M. Jenkins, Rachel F. Warren, Jeff T. Price

Summary: This study projected significant reductions in species richness in Kenya's Tana River Basin with just 2 degrees C warming, especially impacting birds and plants. Potential climate refugia were identified within the basin, but often overlapped with agricultural areas and were mostly outside protected areas. Meeting the Paris Agreement's goal of limiting global warming to 'well below 2 degrees C' significantly reduced risks to biodiversity.

PLOS ONE (2021)

Article Environmental Sciences

Global and regional aggregate damages associated with global warming of 1.5 to 4 °C above pre-industrial levels

R. Warren, C. Hope, D. E. H. J. Gernaat, D. P. Van Vuuren, K. Jenkins

Summary: This study quantifies global and regional aggregate damages under different levels of global warming, finding that limiting warming to 1.5-2 degrees Celsius can greatly reduce GDP losses compared to 4 degrees Celsius warming.

CLIMATIC CHANGE (2021)

Article Environmental Sciences

Quantification of impacts between 1.5 and 4 °C of global warming on flooding risks in six countries

Yi He, Desmond Manful, Rachel Warren, Nicole Forstenhausler, Timothy J. Osborn, Jeff Price, Rhosanna Jenkins, Craig Wallace, Dai Yamazaki

Summary: This study projects an increase in fluvial flood risks due to climate change. Warmer temperatures will lead to a decrease in the return periods of 100-year floods, exposing more people to flood risks. Limiting warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius can reduce the increase in risks.

CLIMATIC CHANGE (2022)

Article Environmental Sciences

Projected risks associated with heat stress in the UK Climate Projections (UKCP18)

Alan T. Kennedy-Asser, Gwilym Owen, Gareth J. Griffith, Oliver Andrews, Y. T. Eunice Lo, Dann M. Mitchell, Katie Jenkins, Rachel F. Warren

Summary: Summer heat extremes in the UK pose a risk to health, especially in socioeconomically vulnerable areas. This study assessed the future variations of different heat elements across the UK using regional climate model simulations. The results showed that southern regions will experience greater increases in maximum temperatures, while northern regions will face greater increases in humidity. When combined with socioeconomic factors, hotspots of high heat stress risk were identified in London, the Midlands, eastern England, and southern and eastern coastal regions.

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS (2022)

Article Environmental Sciences

Quantifying risks avoided by limiting global warming to 1.5 or 2 °C above pre-industrial levels

Rachel Warren, Oliver Andrews, Sally Brown, Felipe J. Colon-Gonzalez, Nicole Forstenhausler, David E. H. J. Gernaat, P. Goodwin, Ian Harris, Yi He, Chris Hope, Desmond Manful, Timothy J. Osborn, Jeff Price, Detlef Van Vuuren, Rebecca Mary Wright

Summary: The Paris Agreement aims to limit global warming to 'well below 2 degrees C' and to 'pursue efforts' to limit it to 1.5 degrees C. By quantifying risk-related metrics, this study demonstrates that reducing warming to 1.5 degrees C or 2 degrees C can significantly reduce risks related to water scarcity, heat stress, flooding, drought, and the economy.

CLIMATIC CHANGE (2022)

Article Environmental Sciences

Quantification of meteorological drought risks between 1.5 °C and 4 °C of global warming in six countries

Jeff Price, Rachel Warren, Nicole Forstenhausler, Craig Wallace, Rhosanna Jenkins, Timothy J. Osborn, D. P. Van Vuuren

Summary: This study quantifies the impacts of different global warming levels on severe droughts in six countries (China, Brazil, Egypt, Ethiopia, Ghana and India). The findings show that current climate change mitigation pledges would lead to severe drought in all studied countries, while meeting the long-term temperature goal of the Paris Agreement would greatly reduce drought risks for these countries.

CLIMATIC CHANGE (2022)

Review Environmental Sciences

Burning embers: towards more transparent and robust climate-change risk assessments

Zinta Zommers, Philippe Marbaix, Andreas Fischlin, Zelina Z. Ibrahim, Sean Grant, Alexandre K. Magnan, Hans-Otto Poertner, Mark Howden, Katherine Calvin, Koko Warner, Wim Thiery, Zita Sebesvari, Edouard L. Davin, Jason P. Evans, Cynthia Rosenzweig, Brian C. O'Neill, Anand Patwardhan, Rachel Warren, Maarten K. van Aalst, Margot Hulbert

NATURE REVIEWS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT (2020)

暂无数据