4.6 Review

Tumor-induced Osteomalacia: A Comprehensive Review

期刊

ENDOCRINE REVIEWS
卷 44, 期 2, 页码 323-353

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/endrev/bnac026

关键词

fibroblast growth factor; phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors; osteomalacia; fracture; DOTA-based imaging; burosumab

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tumor-induced osteomalacia is a rare paraneoplastic syndrome characterized by bone softening and various symptoms. It is often underdiagnosed due to nonspecific symptoms. Biochemical features include hypophosphatemia, abnormal FGF23 levels, and abnormal vitamin D levels. The underlying tumors are usually phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors.
Tumor-induced osteomalacia (TIO) is an ultrarare paraneoplastic syndrome due to overproduction of fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), with profound effects on patient morbidity. TIO is an underdiagnosed disease, whose awareness should be increased among physicians for timely and proper management of patients. Symptoms reported by patients with TIO are usually nonspecific, thus rendering the diagnosis elusive, with an initial misdiagnosis rate of more than 95%. Biochemical features of TIO are represented by hypophosphatemia, increased or inappropriately normal levels of FGF23, and low to low normal circulating 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)(2)D). Phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors are the pathological entities underlying TIO in most affected patients. There is now evidence that FN1-FGFR1 and FN1-FGF1 fusion genes are present in about half of tumors causing this paraneoplastic syndrome. Tumors causing TIO are small and grow slowly. They can occur in all parts of the body from head to toe with similar prevalence in soft tissue and bone. There are a number of functional and anatomical imaging techniques used for tumor localization; Ga-68 DOTA-based technologies have better sensitivity. Surgery is the treatment of choice; several medical treatments are now available in case of inability to locate the tumor or in case of incomplete excision.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据