4.3 Article

Multi-Features Disease Analysis Based Smart Diagnosis for COVID-19

期刊

COMPUTER SYSTEMS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
卷 45, 期 1, 页码 869-886

出版社

TECH SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.32604/csse.2023.029822

关键词

Chest CT; COVID-19; classification; ROC curves; multi-feature disease analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper discusses the use of machine learning models and computer-aided images in diagnosing the impact of COVID-19, with the goal of improving the accuracy and efficiency of the diagnosis.
Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) is the current global buzzword, putting the world at risk. The pandemic's exponential expansion of infected COVID-19 patients has challenged the medical field's resources, which are already few. Even established nations would not be in a perfect position to manage this epi-demic correctly, leaving emerging countries and countries that have not yet begun to grow to address the problem. These problems can be solved by using machine learning models in a realistic way, such as by using computer-aided images during medical examinations. These models help predict the effects of the disease out-break and help detect the effects in the coming days. In this paper, Multi-Features Decease Analysis (MFDA) is used with different ensemble classifiers to diagnose the disease's impact with the help of Computed Tomography (CT) scan images. There are various features associated with chest CT images, which help know the possibility of an individual being affected and how COVID-19 will affect the persons suffering from pneumonia. The current study attempts to increase the precision of the diagnosis model by evaluating various feature sets and choosing the best combination for better results. The model's performance is assessed using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and the Confusion Matrix. It is observed from the resultant outcome that the performance of the proposed model has exhibited better efficient.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据