4.7 Review

Colon cancer and colorectal cancer: Prevention and treatment by potential natural products

期刊

CHEMICO-BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS
卷 368, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbi.2022.110170

关键词

Colon cancer; Colorectal cancer; Natural products; Metastasis; Cancer; Malignancy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Colon cancer is the world's second leading cause of cancer-related deaths, and its death rates have increased due to modern lifestyle. Natural compounds in medicinal plants show potential in combating colon cancer through activation of signaling pathways.
Colon cancer affects both men and women and is the world's second most significant cause of cancer-related mortality. Colon cancer death rates have risen worldwide due to the current food habit and lifestyle, which include a lot of meat, alcohol, and not enough physical exercise. As a result, novel, less harmful pharmacological treatments for colon cancer are needed now more than ever before. Colorectal cancer (CRC) affects a significant portion of the world's population. Chemotherapy's limits, as demonstrated by side effects and resistance in CRC patients, are now being sought after despite recent breakthroughs that have improved patient care and survival. Numerous chemical compounds present in medicinal herbs have shown anti-tumor and anti-apoptotic properties against various cancers, including CRC, in animal experiments. These chemicals, which come from several phytochemical families, activate several signaling pathways. This article discusses research on the anti-CRC benefits of many plants conducted in vitro, as well as the phytochemical components of plants that may play a role in the study. Researchers are also looking into the impact of these compounds on various pathways involved in cancer signaling. According to this review, anti-CRC compounds may be generated from medicinal plants. That's why we're looking at how natural items can help treat cancer while lowering the risk of developing it.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据