4.8 Article

Embryonic origins of adult pluripotent stem cells

期刊

CELL
卷 185, 期 25, 页码 4756-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.11.008

关键词

-

资金

  1. Searle Scholars Program [SSP-2016-1494]
  2. Smith Family Foundation
  3. National Institutes of Health [1R35GM128817]
  4. Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology
  5. NSF-Simons Center for Mathematical and Statistical Analysis of Biology a tHarvard
  6. Harvard Quantitative Biology Initiative [1764269]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reveals the cellular mechanism and molecular trajectory for the formation of adult pluripotent stem cells (aPSCs) during embryonic development. By utilizing lineage tracing and single-cell transcriptome profiling, the researchers identified a molecular trajectory for neoblast formation and showed that aPSCs derive from one lineage instead of multiple tissue-specific lineages.
Although adult pluripotent stem cells (aPSCs) are found in many animal lineages, mechanisms for their for-mation during embryogenesis are unknown. Here, we leveraged Hofstenia miamia, a regenerative worm that possesses collectively pluripotent aPSCs called neoblasts and produces manipulable embryos. Lineage tracing and functional experiments revealed that one pair of blastomeres gives rise to cells that resemble neoblasts in distribution, behavior, and gene expression. In Hofstenia, aPSCs include transcriptionally distinct subpopulations that express markers associated with differentiated tissues; our data suggest that despite their heterogeneity, aPSCs are derived from one lineage, not from multiple tissue-specific lineages during development. Next, we combined single-cell transcriptome profiling across development with neo-blast cell-lineage tracing and identified a molecular trajectory for neoblast formation that includes transcrip-tion factors Hes, FoxO, and Tbx. This identification of a cellular mechanism and molecular trajectory for aPSC formation opens the door for in vivo studies of aPSC regulation and evolution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据