4.7 Article

Dual light-responsive cellulose nanofibril-based in situ hydrogel for drug-resistant bacteria infected wound healing

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
卷 297, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120042

关键词

Cellulose nanofibril; In situ hydrogels; Sol-gel-sol transition; Wound dressing; Hemostasis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22168008]
  2. Guangxi Natural Science Foundation [2021JJA120040]
  3. Guangxi Major Projects of Science and Technology [AA18118013]
  4. Guangxi Innovation -driven Development Special Fund Project [AA18118024-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel wound dressing with rapid hemostasis and antibacterial activity has been developed, which can achieve dual response through white light and NIR irradiation. The dressing exhibits excellent biocompatibility and has promising applications in first-aid hemostasis and wound healing.
In situ hydrogels with rapid hemostasis and antibacterial activity have received considerable attention in the field of wound healing. Herein, a white light and NIR dual light-responsive cellulose nanofibril (CNF)-based in situ hydrogel wound dressing is tailored by using white light-responsive CNF and endogenous antibacterial CNF as the skeleton, Prussian blue nanoparticles, Pluronic (R) F127 and hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose as the NIR, temperature-responsive switch and binder, respectively. The dressing exhibits rapid hemostasis properties in rat liver injury model with low blood loss of 286.4 mg and short hemostasis time of 63 s. Meanwhile, the antibacterial activity of the dressing with white and NIR irradiation against Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is higher than 99.9 %. Interestingly, the dressing with biocompatibility can promote MRSA infection wound healing and can be removed on demand without secondary injury to skin. Therefore, it has promising applications for first-aid hemostasis and wound healing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据