4.5 Article

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the biological rhythms interview of assessment in neuropsychiatry in patients with major depressive disorder

期刊

BMC PSYCHIATRY
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12888-022-04487-w

关键词

Major depressive disorder; Biological rhythm; C-BRIAN

资金

  1. Shanghai Science and Technology Committee
  2. Key Clinical Research Program of Shanghai Mental Health Center [YDZX20213100001003]
  3. Shanghai Natural Science Foundation [CRC2018ZD05]
  4. Funds for talents by Shanghai Mental Health Center [20ZR1448500]
  5. [2022zd02]
  6. [2022-YJ03]
  7. [2020-YJ11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assessed and confirmed the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the BRIAN scale in evaluating the disturbance of biological rhythms in patients with MDD. The results showed good internal consistency, split-half reliability, and excellent test-retest reliability for the C-BRIAN scale. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated acceptable construct validity. Additionally, the total BRIAN scores were negatively correlated with MEQ and positively correlated with PSQI. Patients with MDD had higher BRIAN scores compared to the controls.
BackgroundAlthough disturbances in biological rhythms are closely related to the onset of major depressive disorder (MDD), they are not commonly assessed in Chinese clinical practice. The Biological Rhythms Interview of Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (BRIAN) has been used to evaluate disturbances in biological rhythms in MDD. We aimed to assess and confirm the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the BRIAN (C-BRIAN) in patients with MDD. MethodsA total of 120 patients with MDD and 40 age- and sex-matched controls were recruited consecutively. Reliability was estimated using Cronbach's alpha, the split-half coefficient, and the test-retest coefficient; test-retest reliability was assessed using Spearman's correlation coefficient. A confirmatory factor analysis was used to determine the construct validity of the scale. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) were used to check concurrent validity by evaluating the correlation between the C-BRIAN, PSQI, and MEQ. ResultsThe overall Cronbach's alpha value was 0.898, indicating good internal consistency. The Guttman split-half coefficient was 0.792, indicating good split-half reliability. Moreover, the test-retest reliability for both the total and individual item score was excellent. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed that construct validity was acceptable (chi 2/df = 2.117, GFI = 0.80, AGFI = 0.87, CFI = 0.848, and RMSEA = 0.097). Furthermore, total BRIAN scores were found to be negatively correlated with MEQ (r = - 0.517, P < 0.001) and positively correlated with PSQI (r = 0.586, P < 0.001). In addition, patients with MDD had higher BRIAN scores than those in controls. ConclusionsThis study revealed that the C-BRIAN scale has great validity and reliability in evaluating the disturbance of biological rhythms in patients with MDD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据