Performance of several types of beta-binomial models in comparison to standard approaches for meta-analyses with very few studies
出版年份 2022 全文链接
标题
Performance of several types of beta-binomial models in comparison to standard approaches for meta-analyses with very few studies
作者
关键词
-
出版物
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages -
出版商
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
发表日期
2022-12-13
DOI
10.1186/s12874-022-01779-3
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Comparison of random‐effects meta‐analysis models for the relative risk in the case of rare events: A simulation study
- (2020) Marie Beisemann et al. BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL
- Laplace approximation, penalized quasi-likelihood, and adaptive Gauss–Hermite quadrature for generalized linear mixed models: towards meta-analysis of binary outcome with sparse data
- (2020) Ke Ju et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Using simulation studies to evaluate statistical methods
- (2019) Tim P. Morris et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Pitfalls of using the risk ratio in meta-analysis
- (2019) Ilyas Bakbergenuly et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- A new justification of the Hartung‐Knapp method for random‐effects meta‐analysis based on weighted least squares regression
- (2019) Robbie C.M. Aert et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Random‐effects meta‐analysis of few studies involving rare events
- (2019) Burak Kürsad Günhan et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- A comparison of arm‐based and contrast‐based models for network meta‐analysis
- (2019) Ian R. White et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- A comparison of seven random-effects models for meta-analyses that estimate the summary odds ratio
- (2018) Dan Jackson et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- A comparison of methods for meta-analysis of a small number of studies with binary outcomes
- (2018) Tim Mathes et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Methods for evidence synthesis in the case of very few studies
- (2018) Ralf Bender et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random-effects meta-analyses
- (2018) Dean Langan et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Methods to calculate uncertainty in the estimated overall effect size from a random-effects meta-analysis
- (2018) Areti Angeliki Veroniki et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Exact Inference on the Random-Effects Model for Meta-Analyses with Few Studies
- (2018) Haben Michael et al. BIOMETRICS
- The Hartung-Knapp modification for random-effects meta-analysis: A useful refinement but are there any residual concerns?
- (2017) Dan Jackson et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Performance of the Peto odds ratio compared to the usual odds ratio estimator in the case of rare events
- (2016) A. Catharina Brockhaus et al. BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL
- A general framework for the use of logistic regression models in meta-analysis
- (2016) Mark C Simmonds et al. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH
- Hartung-Knapp method is not always conservative compared with fixed-effect meta-analysis
- (2016) Anna Wiksten et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Conducting Meta-Analyses inRwith themetaforPackage
- (2015) Wolfgang Viechtbauer Journal of Statistical Software
- The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method
- (2014) Joanna IntHout et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Statistical methods for meta-analyses including information from studies without any events-add nothing to nothing and succeed nevertheless
- (2014) O. Kuss STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- The Peto odds ratio viewed as a new effect measure
- (2014) A. Catharina Brockhaus et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- The Use of Two-Way Linear Mixed Models in Multitreatment Meta-Analysis
- (2012) H. P. Piepho et al. BIOMETRICS
- Predicting the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analysis, using empirical data from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- (2012) Rebecca M Turner et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Hans van Houwelingen and the Art of Summing up
- (2010) Stephen Senn BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL
- A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis
- (2008) Julian P. T. Higgins et al. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now