4.7 Article

A Spiking Working Memory Model Based on Hebbian Short-Term Potentiation

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 37, 期 1, 页码 83-96

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1989-16.2016

关键词

Hebbian plasticity; primacy; recency; short-term potentiation; word list learning; working memory

资金

  1. Swedish Science Council Grant Vetenskapradet [VR-621-2009-3807]
  2. VINNOVA (Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems)
  3. VR through the Stockholm Brain Institute
  4. SeRC (Swedish e-science Research Center)
  5. EuroSPIN Erasmus Mundus doctoral programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A dominant theory of working memory (WM), referred to as the persistent activity hypothesis, holds that recurrently connected neural networks, presumably located in the prefrontal cortex, encode and maintain WM memory items through sustained elevated activity. Reexamination of experimental data has shown that prefrontal cortex activity in single units during delay periods is much more variable than predicted by such a theory and associated computational models. Alternative models of WM maintenance based on synaptic plasticity, such as short-term nonassociative (non-Hebbian) synaptic facilitation, have been suggested but cannot account for encoding of novel associations. Here we test the hypothesis that a recently identified fast-expressing form of Hebbian synaptic plasticity (associative short-term potentiation) is a possible mechanism for WM encoding and maintenance. Our simulations using a spiking neural network model of cortex reproduce a range of cognitive memory effects in the classical multi-item WM task of encoding and immediate free recall of word lists. Memory reactivation in the model occurs in discrete oscillatory bursts rather than as sustained activity. We relate dynamic network activity as well as key synaptic characteristics to electrophysiological measurements. Our findings support the hypothesis that fast Hebbian short-term potentiation is a key WM mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据