4.6 Article

Behavior-based pricing and consumer fairness concerns with green product design

期刊

ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-023-05198-5

关键词

Behavior-based pricing (BBP); Fairness; Production efficiency; Price discrimination

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Technological innovation allows firms to produce green products and collect consumer data for price discrimination. However, such discrimination can lead to unfairness when consumers pay higher prices. This paper studies the impact of behavior-based pricing on firms and finds that fairness concerns and differentiation in greenness make such practices profitable. Fairness concerns can increase differentiation and BBP does not always result in higher consumer surplus. Differentiation and fairness concerns reduce social welfare.
Technological innovation enables firms not only to produce green and energy-efficient products but also to more conveniently collect consumer data for price discrimination. However, such price discrimination can easily lead to unfairness when consumers find that they pay a higher price for the same product than others. This paper considers a two-period model with two firms differentiated with respect to greenness and studies the impact of behavior-based pricing (BBP) on the firm when consumers exhibit fairness concerns and the products differ in the improvement in their greenness. We find that when the greening improvement level is exogenous, the existence of consumer fairness concerns and differentiation in the level of greenness make the firm's practice of BBP profitable. When the greening improvement level is endogenous, fairness concerns can increase the differentiation in the improvement in greenness. In addition, consumers' fairness concerns do not always lead to BBP practices yielding a higher consumer surplus. The differentiation in the greenness level and fairness concerns mean that the use of BBP reduces social welfare.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据