4.2 Article

Effect of Fe-Montmorillonite on Flammability Behavior in Polypropylene/Magnesium Hydroxide Composites

期刊

JOURNAL OF NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 16, 期 8, 页码 8287-8293

出版社

AMER SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2016.11615

关键词

Polypropylene; Magnesium Hydroxide; Fe-OMT; Flame Retardant

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20141293]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of the Higher Education Institutions of Jiangsu Province [13KJB430012]
  3. Opening Project of State Key Laboratory of Fire Science [HZ2015-KF03]
  4. Jiangsu province college students' innovative projects [201310299026]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this work was to campare the flame retardancy of polypropylene/magnesium hydroxide (PP/MH) composites containing Fe montmorillonite (Fe-MMT) or not. Two systems of PP/MH and PP/MH/Fe-OMT were prepared by melting intercalation. Depending on the concentration of the Fe-OMT, synergism, and cooperation in flame retardancy were observed. The intercalated and exfoliated PP/MH/Fe-OMT nanocomposites were observed by X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The thermal stability and flame retardant properties were evaluated by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), UL94, limiting oxygen index (LOI), cone calorimeter test. The results indicated that PP/MH/Fe-OMT nanocomposites had excellent thermal stability and flame retardant performance. When the amount of 5 wt% Fe-OMT and 35 wt% MH was added, the PP/MH/Fe-OMT nanocomposites passed V1 rating. However, PP/MH (40 wt%) composites didn't get flame level via UL94 test and the dripping was obvious. The heat release rate, total heat release, smoke production rate, and mass loss rate of PP/MH/Fe-OMT nanocomposites were reduced significantly. The synergistic flame retardancy of Fe-OMT in PP/MH matrix increased the amount of char and reinforced char layer which prevented the diffusion of the oxygen and decomposed organic volatiles in the combustion condition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据