4.4 Article

Pt-doped In2O3 nanoparticles prepared by flame spray pyrolysis for NO2 sensing

期刊

JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH
卷 18, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-016-3341-1

关键词

M (M=Pt, Nb,and Ru)-doped In2O3; Nanoparticles; Flame spray pyrolysis (FSP); NO2 gas sensors

资金

  1. National Research University Project under the Office of the Higher Education Commission, Ministry of Education, Thailand
  2. Graduate School, Chiang Mai University, Thailand
  3. Graduate Institute of Science and Technology [TGIST-01-56-026]
  4. National Science and Technology Development Agency, Thailand

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Undoped In2O3 and 0.25-1.00 wt% M (M=Pt, Nb, and Ru)-doped/loaded In2O3 nanoparticles were successfully synthesized in a single-step flame spray pyrolysis technique using indium nitrate, platinum (II) acetylacetonate, niobium ethoxide, and ruthenium (III) acetylacetonate precursors. The undoped In2O3 and M-doped In2O3 nanoparticles were characterized by Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) analysis, X-ray diffraction (XRD), and scanning and transmission electron microscopy (SEM & TEM). The BET average diameter of spherical nanoparticles was found to be in the range of 10.2-15.2 nm under 5/5 (precursor/oxygen) flame conditions. All XRD peaks were confirmed to correspond to the cubic structure of In2O3. TEM images showed that there is no Pt nanoparticle loaded on In2O3 surface, suggesting that Pt should form solid solution with the In2O3 lattice. Gas sensing studies showed that 0.5 wt% Pt doping in In2O3 nanoparticles gave a significant enhancement of NO2 sensing performances in terms of sensor response and selectivity. 0.5 wt% Pt/In2O3 exhibited a high NO2 response of similar to 1904 to 5 ppm NO2 at 250 degrees C and good NO2 selectivity against NO, H2S, H-2, and C2H5OH. In contrast, Nb and Ru loading resulted in deteriorated NO2 response. Therefore, Pt is demonstrated to be an effective additive to enhance NO2 sensing performances of In2O3-based sensors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据