4.7 Article

Equilibrium modeling of single and binary adsorption of Food Yellow 4 and Food Blue 2 on modified chitosan using a statistical physics theory: new microscopic interpretations

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS
卷 222, 期 -, 页码 151-158

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2016.07.005

关键词

Dyes; Modified chitosan; Single and binary adsorption; Statistical physics models

资金

  1. CAPES (Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel)
  2. CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For a good understanding of the single and binary adsorption systems, the use of statistical physics models is paramount In this research, the monolayer model with two energies and the extended monolayer model with two energies were applied to interpret the single and binary adsorption isotherms of Food Yellow 4 (FY4) and Food Blue 2 (FB2) on modified chitosan at different temperatures. The equilibrium isotherms were constructed experimentally in batch systems at 298, 308, 318 and 328 K. The statistical physics models were developed using the grand canonical ensemble containing different steric and energetic physicochemical parameters, which allow the microscopic interpretation of the adsorption process. The adsorption isotherms were interpreted according to these parameters, which were obtained by numerical simulation. The main contribution of this work is to attribute new microscopic interpretations for the adsorption of FY4 and FB2 on modified chitosan, in single and binary systems at different temperatures. A multimolecular and multianchorage process in single and binary system respectively was described by the study of the number of molecules per site. The investigation of the adsorption energy indicated that the electrostatic interaction and hydrogen bond interactions are the dominant contribution describing the adsorption of these dyes for the single and binary adsorption. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据