4.7 Article

Learning the representation of surrogate safety measures to identify traffic conflict

期刊

ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION
卷 174, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106755

关键词

Traffic conflict; Surrogate safety measure (SSM); Evasive action; Interaction pattern; Clustering; Time series data; Deep unsupervised learning; Transformer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a method to identify traffic conflict using deep unsupervised learning and clustering. By encoding safety measure sequences into a latent space, traffic conflict and non-conflict clusters are identified through classification and visualization. The identified traffic conflict clusters contain critical conditions, and one vehicle takes evasive action to avoid accidents.
Traffic conflict can be identified by the presence of evasive actions or the amount of temporal (spatial) proximity measures like time-to-collision (TTC). However, it is not enough to use only one kind of measures in some scenarios and it is hard to set a threshold for those measures. This paper proposed a method to identify traffic conflict by learning the representation of TTC and driver maneuver profiles with deep unsupervised learning and clustering the representations into traffic conflict and non-conflict clusters. We first trained a transformer encoder to encode sequences of surrogate safety measures into some latent space with unsupervised pre-training. Second, we identified informative clusters in the latent space by calculating the statistic summaries and visualizing trajectory pairs of each cluster. Some clusters are interpreted as traffic conflict clusters because they have small TTC, large deceleration rate and intertwining trajectories and they can be further interpreted as rear-end or angle conflicts. Moreover, the identified traffic conflicts contain critical conditions from the two vehicles in an interaction and one vehicle perceives them as abnormal and takes evasive action to avoid crashes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据