4.6 Article

Principles of target DNA cleavage and the role of Mg2+ in the catalysis of CRISPR-Cas9

期刊

NATURE CATALYSIS
卷 5, 期 10, 页码 912-922

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41929-022-00848-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Health [R01GM136815, R01GM141329]
  2. National Science Foundation [MCB-2143760, CHE-1905374]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation [31003A_182567]
  4. XSEDE [TG-MCB160059]
  5. NERSC [M3807]
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [31003A_182567] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the catalytic mechanism of CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing technology, revealing the relationship between active HNH nuclease and catalytic Mg2+ as well as the roles of catalytic residues H840 and K866. The findings provide valuable insights for enhancing the enzymatic function of CRISPR-Cas9.
At the core of the CRISPR-Cas9 genome-editing technology, the endonuclease Cas9 introduces site-specific breaks in DNA. However, precise mechanistic information to ameliorate Cas9 function is still missing. Here, multimicrosecond molecular dynamics, free energy and multiscale simulations are combined with solution NMR and DNA cleavage experiments to resolve the catalytic mechanism of target DNA cleavage. We show that the conformation of an active HNH nuclease is tightly dependent on the catalytic Mg2+, unveiling its cardinal structural role. This activated Mg2+-bound HNH is consistently described through molecular simulations, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and DNA cleavage assays, revealing also that the protonation state of the catalytic H840 is strongly affected by active site mutations. Finally, ab initio quantum mechanics (density functional theory)/molecular mechanics simulations and metadynamics establish the catalytic mechanism, showing that the catalysis is activated by H840 and completed by K866, thus rationalizing DNA cleavage experiments. This information is critical to enhancing the enzymatic function of CRISPR-Cas9 towards improved genome editing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据